Analysis in 2D

02-Getting started with the modelling
Post Reply
khan0099
Posts: 4
Joined: 09 Jul 2015, 11:23

Analysis in 2D

Post by khan0099 »

Dear sir !
i am asking a question irrelevant but i need it's answer , i have design a 3D model in etab , which i want to analyse in seismo-struct . my question is can i analyse a 3D model in 2D in seismo-struct , Is there any changes in result will be occur or not , need an explained answer ,
Thank you
regards
User avatar
z.gronti
Posts: 863
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:14

Re: Analysis in 2D

Post by z.gronti »

Dear Khan,

There will be changes if you analyze a 3D model as a 2D model. The changes depend on the simplifications you make.
Zoi Gronti
Seismosoft Srl.
User avatar
ruipinho
Posts: 166
Joined: 07 Dec 2013, 14:37

Re: Analysis in 2D

Post by ruipinho »

khan0099,

Is there a particular reason why you wish to force a 2D analysis in SeismoStruct? Why do you not simply build a 3D model of your structure in SeismoStruct?

Best,

Rui
khan0099
Posts: 4
Joined: 09 Jul 2015, 11:23

Re: Analysis in 2D

Post by khan0099 »

dear sir !
it took alot of time to analyze a 3D model in seismo-struct ,
Can you explain the changes that will happened when i analyze a 3D model in 2D in seismo-struct .
User avatar
ruipinho
Posts: 166
Joined: 07 Dec 2013, 14:37

Re: Analysis in 2D

Post by ruipinho »

khan0099,

Yes, a 2D analysis will indeed be faster than a 3D one.

However, naturally, if your structure is not regular in plan and/or your seismic input is bidirectional, then your 2D simplification will inevitably introduce errors.

I suggest that you run some experiments with small sub-sets of your full model, comparing the results you obtain with 2D and 3D analyses, and then withdraw your own conclusions.

Best of luck with your investigations,

Rui
Post Reply

Return to “02-Getting started with the modelling”