Sections

05-Future developments & requests
Post Reply
TUC
Posts: 40
Joined: 01 Sep 2012, 06:35
Location: Greece

Sections

Post by TUC »

It will be useful if the user could define distributed-plasticity, infrm elements, but with "uniaxial sections" (i.e to define a standard constitutive law -response diagram- at each monitoring section -I.P) instead only with fiber sections.
Many times, this is quite efficient computationally and sufficient numerically (if there is no need to couple axial forces with bending moments, i.e in beams).
User avatar
seismosoft
Posts: 1316
Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 04:55

Re: Sections

Post by seismosoft »

Dear TUC,

Thank you for your suggestion, which we agree to be a pertinent one, and which we will thus certainly add to our (long) future features list.

Thanks again,

Seismosoft Support
Post Reply

Return to “05-Future developments & requests”