Dear Seismostruct group,
I am desiging a concentrically braced frame, thus I need to put in a initial deformation in braces for to analyze through pushover. However, in my model, I am putting small initial deformation (L/250 = 20 mm) in braces, and I can not run it. But, when i put big deformation ( for example: 70 mm ), the program can run the model. What do you think?
Model descriptions:
- 8 storey;
- composite columns, steel beams and braces;
- Braces are pinned by links;
- elements:
infrmDB - Columns
infrmFB - Beamns and braces
Best Regards,
Andre Silva
Initial deformation of Braces
-
Andre Tenchini
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 11:54
Re: Initial deformation of Braces
When I say "the program does not run" this means that it sotp in given step, ie I can found the maximum load (yield load) from plastic mechanism.
Best regards
Best regards
- seismosoft
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 04:55
Re: Initial deformation of Braces
Dear André,
We checked quickly the model you sent us, and noticed that you are using four infrmFB elements with 5 integration points to model beams, which contradicts the suggestions in the Help System. Any particular reason for that?
The same goes for the braces, any particular reason for using two infrmFB elements with 5 integration points?
Note that the above issues are not necessarily related to the difficulties you report, but might nonetheless be worth addressing before progressing any further.
Seismosoft Support
PS: if you could replace the one out-of-plane non-structural node that you currently have in your model with an in-plane one (obviously adjusting the local axes of the related elements), the out-of-plane restraints will no longer be visualised in the renderings.
We checked quickly the model you sent us, and noticed that you are using four infrmFB elements with 5 integration points to model beams, which contradicts the suggestions in the Help System. Any particular reason for that?
The same goes for the braces, any particular reason for using two infrmFB elements with 5 integration points?
Note that the above issues are not necessarily related to the difficulties you report, but might nonetheless be worth addressing before progressing any further.
Seismosoft Support
PS: if you could replace the one out-of-plane non-structural node that you currently have in your model with an in-plane one (obviously adjusting the local axes of the related elements), the out-of-plane restraints will no longer be visualised in the renderings.
