Search found 9 matches
- 05 May 2013, 19:07
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: 3rd mode pushover curve
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2603
Re: 3rd mode pushover curve
You are right. Sorry.
- 02 May 2013, 22:18
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: 3rd mode pushover curve
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2603
3rd mode pushover curve
<t>I obtained a weird pushover curve for a 3rd mode distribution for a 3-floors steel frame. At first the displacement of the third floor goes in the right direction but suddenly, because of a soft mechanism of the first floor the displacement of the third floor start to go in the left direction. It ...
- 16 Apr 2013, 11:52
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: chord rotation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3012
chord rotation
Hi, I would know if in SeismoStruct it is possible to define as acceptance criteria a chord rotation value that depends on the axial force on the same element, as recommended in FEMA 356 or ASCE/SEI 41.
Thanks!
Thanks!
- 13 Apr 2013, 17:45
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: equivalent bilinearisation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1959
equivalent bilinearisation
I don't know if I can ask this here, anyway I wanted to know how to obtain a bilinear from an adaptive pushover curve (which gamma should I use?
Thanks.
Thanks.
- 06 Apr 2013, 11:45
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: geometric nonlinear effects in pushover analysis
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3796
Re: geometric nonlinear effects in pushover analysis
<t>Hi hufftle, thanks for your help. Anyway I solved the problem, maybe. In my structural model (MRF) I assigned a diaphragm at every floor and it didn't work as I told in the previous message. So I removed the diaphragms and now it work very well, I mean that the curve that the program provides as ...
- 05 Apr 2013, 21:18
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: geometric nonlinear effects in pushover analysis
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3796
geometric nonlinear effects in pushover analysis
<t>I have made a non-adaptive pushover analysis on a 3-levels steel frame. The class of my elements are infrmFB and I used as material stl_mp. If I run the analysis without including the geometric nonlinear effects, the pushover curve is very widespread and the analysis continues until the end, but ...
- 04 Apr 2013, 19:50
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: two - dimensional eigenvalue analysis
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3754
Re: two - dimensional eigenvalue analysis
Maybe I've solved my problem, I think that if I want to see only the modes in the x - z plane I have to tick only the X direction in the "global direction mass".Is it the better way?
- 04 Apr 2013, 16:42
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: two - dimensional eigenvalue analysis
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3754
Re: two - dimensional eigenvalue analysis
<t>I've noticed that the problem that I illustrated in the first message does not occur anymore if I put the elements' mass equal to zero in "element classes" and if I put the mass only by defining the lumped masses at every node. In this way I have no problem and I can define both the rigid ...
- 03 Apr 2013, 22:35
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: two - dimensional eigenvalue analysis
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3754
two - dimensional eigenvalue analysis
<t>Hello to everyone, I'm a beginner on seismo_struct and I need your help for some issues. I've made an eigenvalue analysis on a simple two-dimensional frame, and among the ten vibration modes that the program shows as output, most of them makes the structure oscillating out of the x-z plane. I ...
