Accelerogram on Scaled Down Structure

02-Getting started with the modelling
Post Reply
adeelfaisal
Posts: 42
Joined: 29 Apr 2014, 15:42

Accelerogram on Scaled Down Structure

Post by adeelfaisal »

In an experimental work, El Centro earthquake time history is to be applied to a bridge which has been scaled down (1/6 of actual). Will the actual time history be also scaled down by the same factor (1/6 of actual time history) or applied as such with no changes to the actual time history ?
huffte
Posts: 1005
Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 10:19
Location: Cookeville, Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Re: Accelerogram on Scaled Down Structure

Post by huffte »

Hi adeelfaisal. I don't believe a yes or no answer is possible. I would recommend a literature search. You could begin with the following:

http://nees.berkeley.edu/Events/200512a ... litude.pdf

Depending upon scale factors chosen by you, various response quantities for the prototype and model will be preserved, others will not. It's an interesting topic.

Best of luck adeelfaisal.
Tim Huff
fakharifar.mostafa
Posts: 124
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 05:34

Re: Accelerogram on Scaled Down Structure

Post by fakharifar.mostafa »

In shake table tests in addition to the scale factor of the prototype structure, low cycle fatigue is considered as well (they try to avoid it at first runs!). Based on the what I know, answer to your question is YES,the time history is reduced for a prototype structure, but not 1/6 exactly (they consider shake table capacity + response quantity + low cycle fatigue + ...). Preliminary simulations are used to determine the level of modification factor, and they even change the time axis (compress or decompress) of the acceleration time history. In shake table tests, they often start from low intensity let's say for instance from 0.2x(EQ) => 0.4x(EQ) up to 1.5x(EQ) (for example for sure)or any amplified motion that can bring the bridge close to incipient collapse.
For detailed information on this topic I recommend you read Prof. Saiid Saiidi work at University Nevada, Reno, specifically his former PhD student Ashkan Vosooghi's work. What you asked is not a new topic indeed. It is a shake table test question.
For instance "the ground motion displacement amplitudes
were reduced by 75% to account for the scale of the test model,
which was 0.25." You see the answer to your question!

Below I have included some links to some papers that will help you on this topic. Hope they help. That would be great if you share your research findings here as well, to let us know abut it.

https://nees.unr.edu/Documents/nees/cir ... umn_c1.pdf

https://nees.unr.edu/Documents/nees/Int ... umn_I2.pdf

Arias-Acosta, J. and Sanders, D. (2010) Shake Table Testing of Bridge Columns under Combined Actions. Structures Congress 2010: pp. 1805-1816.
doi: 10.1061/41130(369)165

Saiidi, M. S., Vosooghi, A., Choi, H., & Somerville, P. (2013). Shake Table Studies and Analysis of a Two-Span RC Bridge Model Subjected to a Fault Rupture. Journal of Bridge Engineering.

http://eccomasproceedings.org/cs2013/pdf/1112.pdf

Saiidi, M. S., Vosooghi, A., & Nelson, R. B. (2012). Shake-Table Studies of a Four-Span Reinforced Concrete Bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(8), 1352-1361.
Post Reply

Return to “02-Getting started with the modelling”