Eigenvalues analysis

04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Post Reply
bassking
Posts: 8
Joined: 21 Feb 2012, 12:28

Eigenvalues analysis

Post by bassking »

Hi guys, i have a little problem with an eigenvalues analysis. I'm modelling a simple deck bridge, without the piers, only to obtain the periods of the superstructure. The deck is made with 4 span of continuos box-girder, 50 meters each. So i define 5 nodes, first and last are fix, over the second, third and fourth i assign lumped mass in 3 direction (X,Y,Z). I must obtain 9 periods (3 mass for 3 degrees of freedom), but seismostruct give me only 7 (but the last is "immaginary or null") eigen and "Warning: Could not re-orthogonalise all Lanczos vectors" error. Model is very simple, i don't understand where is the problem.
huffte
Posts: 1005
Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 10:19
Location: Cookeville, Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Re: Eigenvalues analysis

Post by huffte »

Hi bassking.

I'm not sure what is going on with your model. I threw together a quick model similar to the one you describe and I had no trouble getting the modes using either Lanczos or Ritz solution for the eigenvalues.

Check your settings - if you are using Lanczos, then ask for more modes than you really want. If you are using Ritz Vectors, then ask for 5 vectors in each of the 3 directions - this will be more than enough so some of them will, in fact, be imaginary.

Tools -> Project Settings -> Eigenvalue

I hope this helps you zero in on the problem bassking.
Tim Huff
Stelios_Antoniou
Posts: 89
Joined: 17 Jul 2011, 20:08

Re: Eigenvalues analysis

Post by Stelios_Antoniou »

With smaller models the Ritz+Jacobi method is considerably more stable.
Post Reply

Return to “04-Unexpected behaviour/errors”