Lightly reinforced concrete walls

03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
Post Reply
Pantelis_Kalderis
Posts: 6
Joined: 09 May 2024, 10:48

Lightly reinforced concrete walls

Post by Pantelis_Kalderis »

Hello. I would like to ask what is the most proper way of modelling "lightly reinforced concrete walls" in SeismoStruct?
Is it through typical wall elements or it is more suitable to consider them as concrete infills? Thanks.
User avatar
seismosoft
Posts: 1246
Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 04:55

Re: Lightly reinforced concrete walls

Post by seismosoft »

It depends. If the wall is part of the load resisting mechanism, it should be modelled as a frame element. If instead the wall has been built after the completion of the frame of the building, it should be modelled as an infill. The key element here is whether the wall is employed to resist the gravity loads of the slab.

Seismosoft Support
Pantelis_Kalderis
Posts: 6
Joined: 09 May 2024, 10:48

Re: Lightly reinforced concrete walls

Post by Pantelis_Kalderis »

In my case I have solid r/c walls that resist also gravity loads, so they shouldn't be modelled as infills. My concern though is whether a long e.g. 6m wall should be modelled as a frame element. Would it be correct to model it as a "masonry-type" element instead? Or such elements are inappropriate for reinforced concrete?
User avatar
seismosoft
Posts: 1246
Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 04:55

Re: Lightly reinforced concrete walls

Post by seismosoft »

It depends on the modelling requirements, and I am afraid we cannot give you a straightforward answer. If it is a lightly reinforced concrete wall, it should be modelled either with a frame element (elastic or inelastic) or with shell (the elastic) elements. The latter is more accurate in the elastic range, however it cannot capture inelastic response obviously.
Seismosoft Support
Post Reply

Return to “03-Analytical/modelling capabilities”