Shear collapse

03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
Post Reply
sanya greek
Posts: 74
Joined: 07 Nov 2018, 12:08

Shear collapse

Post by sanya greek »

Hello!!!

How its possible, that collapse due shear capacity in columns of ground floor are earlier than collapse by chord rotation?
I think that you forget to use VR,c for shear capacity before collapse by chord rotation?

Image

Thank you!
User avatar
seismosoft
Posts: 1271
Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 04:55

Re: Shear collapse

Post by seismosoft »

It mostly depends on the reinforcement of the members. Note that usually in eixting buildings shear failures occur first.
Seismosoft Support
sanya greek
Posts: 74
Joined: 07 Nov 2018, 12:08

Re: Shear collapse

Post by sanya greek »

seismosoft wrote: 04 Jun 2020, 16:53 It mostly depends on the reinforcement of the members. Note that usually in eixting buildings shear failures occur first.
Seismosoft Support
Ok. Example from my work:

Column Dimension
Image

Reinforcement
Image

Steel properties
Image

Concrete properties
Image

N=340KN.

By KAN.EPE 7.2.2 (δ) eq. (Σ3) Vr,c= 145 KN

Ls=1.4m, My(or Mrd)=96, so Vmu=96/1.4=68,5 <145 KN.
So, the column collapse by chord rotation first.
But programm show, that Shear Capacity = 38 KN

Image

It have not logic, i think
User avatar
seismosoft
Posts: 1271
Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 04:55

Re: Shear collapse

Post by seismosoft »

Sanya, all your points above are wrong. Furthermore, views like the one that you just expressed that what we are doing 'has not logic' is a strong expression that needs to be well justified. If you do not feel confident with the program, you can freely choose another structural analysis package, there are plenty available.
Coming to your remarks above, you need to study the Code more carefully, but most importantly this is a forum on the use of our programs, not on the implementation of KANEPE and the other Codes. You should discuss such questions with your supervisor, not through this forum.
The shear capacity is calculated by equation (C.1) in Appendic 7C.
Vr,c from KAN.EPE 7.2.2 (δ) eq. (Σ3) is the shear force the causes diagonal cracking, it is not the shear capacity of the member.
Seismosoft Support
sanya greek
Posts: 74
Joined: 07 Nov 2018, 12:08

Re: Shear collapse

Post by sanya greek »

seismosoft wrote: 05 Jun 2020, 11:08 Sanya, all your points above are wrong. Furthermore, views like the one that you just expressed that what we are doing 'has not logic' is a strong expression that needs to be well justified. If you do not feel confident with the program, you can freely choose another structural analysis package, there are plenty available.
Coming to your remarks above, you need to study the Code more carefully, but most importantly this is a forum on the use of our programs, not on the implementation of KANEPE and the other Codes. You should discuss such questions with your supervisor, not through this forum.
The shear capacity is calculated by equation (C.1) in Appendic 7C.
Vr,c from KAN.EPE 7.2.2 (δ) eq. (Σ3) is the shear force the causes diagonal cracking, it is not the shear capacity of the member.
Seismosoft Support
I apologize if I offended you! I just expressed my opinion, did not want to offend you.
sanya greek
Posts: 74
Joined: 07 Nov 2018, 12:08

Re: Shear collapse

Post by sanya greek »

That what i mean

Image
User avatar
seismosoft
Posts: 1271
Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 04:55

Re: Shear collapse

Post by seismosoft »

This is one of the checks of the Italian NTC-18 code. It is a completely differnet procedure from KANEPE's expressions
Seismosoft Support
Post Reply

Return to “03-Analytical/modelling capabilities”