Search found 59 matches
- 19 Feb 2015, 19:51
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: Concrete Cracked Section
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12417
Re: Concrete Cracked Section
I know that.I mean for analysis of damaged element it would be better to indicate that in FIBER BEAM-COLUMN ELEMENT
- 09 Feb 2015, 00:34
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: Concrete Cracked Section
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12417
Concrete Cracked Section
<r>Dear Seismostruct team,<br/>
For modeling of Concrete Cracked Sections, and checking of Performance of this sections during next loading (earthquakes), it would be better if for example this fibers which i show in this image can be omitted for a few fiber sections along the element.<br/>
I mean ...
For modeling of Concrete Cracked Sections, and checking of Performance of this sections during next loading (earthquakes), it would be better if for example this fibers which i show in this image can be omitted for a few fiber sections along the element.<br/>
I mean ...
- 12 Sep 2014, 21:57
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: New steel sections for nonlinear element
- Replies: 10
- Views: 11693
Re: New steel sections for nonlinear element
Thanks [:)]
- 11 Sep 2014, 22:51
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: New steel sections for nonlinear element
- Replies: 10
- Views: 11693
Re: New steel sections for nonlinear element
<t>quote:Originally posted by z.gronti<br/>
<br/>
Dear salar,<br/>
<br/>
A number of 700 predefined most common steel sections was available in old versions of SeismoStruct. In the new version of SeismoStruct v7.0 this number has been overdoubled (almost 1500 predefined steel sections are now ...
<br/>
Dear salar,<br/>
<br/>
A number of 700 predefined most common steel sections was available in old versions of SeismoStruct. In the new version of SeismoStruct v7.0 this number has been overdoubled (almost 1500 predefined steel sections are now ...
- 11 Sep 2014, 10:48
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: New steel sections for nonlinear element
- Replies: 10
- Views: 11693
Re: New steel sections for nonlinear element
Dear Seismostruct team,
I really appreciate for v.7, It gets much better for modeling concrete structures. But for steel frame structures, steel fiber sections are very low and it would be better if New steel sections which is recommend before are added in next version.
Thanks
I really appreciate for v.7, It gets much better for modeling concrete structures. But for steel frame structures, steel fiber sections are very low and it would be better if New steel sections which is recommend before are added in next version.
Thanks
- 28 Jun 2014, 08:55
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: steel rebar distance in Concrete Cross section
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3815
Re: steel rebar distance in Concrete Cross section
thanks,
But sorting the element and point is really needed.
But sorting the element and point is really needed.
- 25 Jun 2014, 22:27
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: steel rebar distance in Concrete Cross section
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3815
steel rebar distance in Concrete Cross section
<r>Dear seismosoft team'<br/>
While we click "Edit reinforcement pattern" steel rebar is gotten half in confined area and half in unconfined area <br/>
and diameter of stirrup and half longitudinal steel rebar is not included for distance of steel rebar from confine area. It is really important and ...
While we click "Edit reinforcement pattern" steel rebar is gotten half in confined area and half in unconfined area <br/>
and diameter of stirrup and half longitudinal steel rebar is not included for distance of steel rebar from confine area. It is really important and ...
- 23 Jun 2014, 13:56
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Different Moment-curvature result
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14196
Re: Different Moment-curvature result
Hi huffe
Would you please,give me an other email address beside:Tim.Huff@tn.gov
Google can't send files to @tn.gov
my email address: salar.d.ghashghaei@gmail.com
Would you please,give me an other email address beside:Tim.Huff@tn.gov
Google can't send files to @tn.gov
my email address: salar.d.ghashghaei@gmail.com
- 21 Jun 2014, 01:00
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Different Moment-curvature result
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14196
Re: Different Moment-curvature result
Thanks, I sent to your email.
- 20 Jun 2014, 15:41
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Different Moment-curvature result
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14196
Re: Different Moment-curvature result
<r>Dear huffe,<br/>
Thanks for your help. I checked steel-bl and it doesn't changed.<br/>
XTRACT stop the analysis while confined strain reached to ecu. if assume <br/>
seismostruct continue loading the structure once a bar fracture occurs so the curvature is okey, but as you see the Moment strength ...
Thanks for your help. I checked steel-bl and it doesn't changed.<br/>
XTRACT stop the analysis while confined strain reached to ecu. if assume <br/>
seismostruct continue loading the structure once a bar fracture occurs so the curvature is okey, but as you see the Moment strength ...