Search found 16 matches
- 31 Oct 2012, 10:49
- Forum: 01-Installation of new versions
- Topic: new version
- Replies: 8
- Views: 15376
Re: new version
Any news about the new version?
- 27 Feb 2012, 00:16
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Load control vs Response control
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3695
Load control vs Response control
As far as i am concerned seismosoft suggests to use response control loading when using conventional force based pushover analysis (correct me if not). When using displacement based adaptive pushover analysis should i use adaptive load or response control option?
- 26 Feb 2012, 15:44
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: shear deformation component
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2726
Re: shear deformation component
Do you plan to include this feature in the next version? If yes, it will be calculated using the formula included in EC8 pt3?
- 16 Jun 2011, 18:35
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Displacement load in Pushover
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2779
Re: Displacement load in Pushover
any suggestion from the seismosoft support?
- 22 May 2011, 13:15
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Displacement load in Pushover
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2779
Displacement load in Pushover
<t>In adaptive pushover analysis of a 3D building model should i apply the displacement in perimeter nodes of each direction, in all nodes of the structure, or i can assign just one displacement in a centre node?<br/>
<br/>
In my model (1 storey building with lamped mass at columns) in the X ...
<br/>
In my model (1 storey building with lamped mass at columns) in the X ...
- 22 May 2011, 13:01
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Shear reinforcement & Confinement
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3243
Re: Shear reinforcement & Confinement
Fbianchi thank you very much!
- 22 May 2011, 12:52
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Message: INCIRCUM-F-Points are coincident
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2386
Re: Message: INCIRCUM-F-Points are coincident
Seismosoft thanks for the reply! Now that i checked again my model for some reason i do no get this error message anymore. If it start appearing again i will let you know. Many thanks again.
- 19 May 2011, 22:38
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: RC jacket section
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3019
Re: RC jacket section
Yes, thats exactly what i am doing up to now. What i wrote was just a suggestion to make this really good software even better! Keep up the good work!! 

- 17 May 2011, 23:28
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Message: INCIRCUM-F-Points are coincident
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2386
Message: INCIRCUM-F-Points are coincident
After running a pushover analysis i got the following error message: 'INCIRCUM-F-Points are coincident'. Can someone please explain me what does this mean? Thank you in advance!
- 17 May 2011, 23:25
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Shear reinforcement & Confinement
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3243
Re: Shear reinforcement & Confinement
Thank you for your answer! So does this means that when assessing an existing structure seismostruct just looks the moment capacity of the elements and not their shear strength? What about if the element has failed in shear before the full moment capacity of the element is achieved?