Where exactly does this happen? In which code, specifically? We checked it and the spectrum changes, when the user changes the damping value.
Seismosoft Support
Search found 2477 matches
- 01 Jul 2025, 16:07
- Forum: 03-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Changing Damping does not change
- Replies: 1
- Views: 17
- 29 May 2025, 07:52
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: First Mode Period of Steel MRF
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1088
Re: First Mode Period of Steel MRF
The wizard create a sample model that is not necessarily correct technically, for instance in steel buildings there are no steel braces (which is the main reason for the very large fundamental period). It is just a way to introduce the program quickly to new users.
Seismosoft Support
Seismosoft Support
- 22 May 2025, 09:27
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modeling of Friction Pendulum in Seismobuild Advanced
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1251
Re: Modeling of Friction Pendulum in Seismobuild Advanced
Can you be more specific? What do you mean with "the parameters (of the Friction Pendulum isolators) that can be entered in the modeling window, are derived directly from the one for elastomeric isolators"?
If you mean that the two types of isolators have the same input, this is not correct. The ...
If you mean that the two types of isolators have the same input, this is not correct. The ...
- 21 May 2025, 15:47
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Calculation of depth of the compressed zone
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1138
Re: Calculation of depth of the compressed zone
Hello NunoRibeiro,
1) The section internal quantities, like the depth of the compression zone, are directly calculated from the element fibers, since the program knows which fibers are under tensions and under compression
2) This discrepancy is due to stress recovery, which employs the uncracked ...
1) The section internal quantities, like the depth of the compression zone, are directly calculated from the element fibers, since the program knows which fibers are under tensions and under compression
2) This discrepancy is due to stress recovery, which employs the uncracked ...
- 15 May 2025, 10:37
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: incremental dynamic analysis, curve multiplier
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1708
Re: incremental dynamic analysis, curve multiplier
1. unless you know exactly what you are doing, you should not change the automatic values of the program
2. As we explained in another question that you posted, in dynamic analysis the fixed nodes have an absolute displacement according to the applied accelerogram.
Seismosoft Support
2. As we explained in another question that you posted, in dynamic analysis the fixed nodes have an absolute displacement according to the applied accelerogram.
Seismosoft Support
- 15 May 2025, 10:32
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Friction Pendulum Isolators
- Replies: 15
- Views: 11660
Re: Friction Pendulum Isolators
If you run dynamic time-history analysis the absolute displacement of a fixed node is the one derived from the integration of the acceleration time-history applied to that node. What is of interest to you is the relative displacement between the other nodes and the fixed node.
Seismosoft Support
Seismosoft Support
- 08 May 2025, 21:29
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Incremental Dynamic Analysis (PGA vs Drift)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2073
Re: Incremental Dynamic Analysis (PGA vs Drift)
Yes, you need to get the drift time-histories for each scaling factor separately.
Seismosoft Support
Seismosoft Support
- 08 May 2025, 21:28
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: incremental dynamic analysis, curve multiplier
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1708
Re: incremental dynamic analysis, curve multiplier
If you select to loads a file that follows the PEER format, the program reads it and it automatically applies the correct scaling factor (9.81 in your case).
Seismosoft Support
Seismosoft Support
- 08 May 2025, 20:55
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Maximum allowed number of structural nodes
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1688
Re: Maximum allowed number of structural nodes
This was a problem that appeared in large models with strip footings. We compiled a new release for both programs with an increased limit and your models can be loaded without problems. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Seismosoft Support
Seismosoft Support
- 07 Apr 2025, 07:37
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Masonry Wall Modeling- MIMK manipulation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1543
Re: Masonry Wall Modeling- MIMK manipulation
Both MIMK curves have several parameters that define the way their hysteresis works, but also the way that the strength deteriorates. From your description, and since you do not face numerical difficulties, it seems that you are introducing significant deterioration with the parameters of the model ...