<t>I experienced numerical instability when using a very fine element mesh, while with a coarser mesh numerical instability improved and delivered satisfactory pushover results. I investigated the results of the coarser mesh and found that the results were accurate.<br/>
<br/>
What could be the ...
Search found 8 matches
- 23 Oct 2009, 16:11
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Element length
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2266
- 02 Jun 2009, 16:04
- Forum: 01-Installation of new versions
- Topic: Expired license start-up problem
- Replies: 17
- Views: 13700
Re: Expired license start-up problem
Dear SeismoSoft Team
Thank you for your quick effort to fix the problem! Everything is working well now.
Regards
Johann van der Merwe
Thank you for your quick effort to fix the problem! Everything is working well now.
Regards
Johann van der Merwe
- 01 Jun 2009, 09:35
- Forum: 01-Installation of new versions
- Topic: Expired license start-up problem
- Replies: 17
- Views: 13700
Re: Expired license start-up problem
Is there any way that the older version can be used until such a time that the new version is available?
Regards
Johann van der Merwe
Regards
Johann van der Merwe
- 19 Apr 2009, 11:49
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Confined concrete
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2822
Confined concrete
<t>To Whom It May Concern<br/>
<br/>
I can not find any information in the help file on how SeismoStruct computes the confined concrete area. Is this area simply calculated as the area inclosed by the stirrups? The true confined area is less than this area depending on the distance between ...
<br/>
I can not find any information in the help file on how SeismoStruct computes the confined concrete area. Is this area simply calculated as the area inclosed by the stirrups? The true confined area is less than this area depending on the distance between ...
- 30 Jan 2009, 14:42
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Shear wall frame
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4285
Re: Shear wall frame
<r>Thank you very much! It is probally only a mistake on my behalf, but I just cannot figure it out. Any help will be appreciated. I do not expect a full investigation into the problem.<br/>
I will be sending the file to the e-mail adress <EMAIL email="info@seismosoft.com">info@seismosoft.com</EMAIL ...
I will be sending the file to the e-mail adress <EMAIL email="info@seismosoft.com">info@seismosoft.com</EMAIL ...
- 29 Jan 2009, 17:15
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Shear wall frame
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4285
Shear wall frame
<t>I am having trouble performing a pushover analysis on a structural frame consisting of a shear wall, flat slab and column elements. I have made sure that the rigid links between the centre line of the shear wall element and the adjacent slab elements are correctly modelled, but the analysis stops ...
- 21 Jan 2009, 13:51
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Shear wall - slab connections
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4806
Re: Shear wall - slab connections
<t>Hallo. Thank you very much. The analysis ran when I lowered the E value of the lever arms. I have connected concrete elements (material con_cc) with a lever arm with an elastic material (el_mat) chosen. No E value is assigned to the concrete material but is assigned to the reinforcing steel in ...
- 19 Jan 2009, 13:48
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Shear wall - slab connections
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4806
Shear wall - slab connections
<t>To model a frame with columns, slabs and a shear wall I understand that one will have to model rigid lever arms from the centre line of the shear wall being modelled and the slab elements on both sides of the shear wall to obtain the correct displacement of the slab next to the shear wall. These ...