Seismosoft | Earthquake Engineering Solutions

Hello,

thanks for your answer.

I want to mention the 7.2.3 (2) of KAN.EPE. where this formula is proposed for the active stiffness in inelastic analysis. Seismobuild have this option to use MY/θy and the results are way different if you use this formula in comparison with uncracked stiffness ...

I have already run with both ways.. the scenario with cracked stiffness is much more unfavorable.. the differences in the results are huge.. thats why i have to know if running with uncracked stiffness is correct or not.. and why seismobuild have by default the uncracked stiffness :/

Hello,

seismobuild having by default uncracked stiffness in the advance setting dialog. For Pushover analysis what the correct way? Using cracked or uncracked stiffness?

Thanks