Hello,
in my model the calculation of target displacement (EC8) of SDoF is dt=0.47cm
and in MDoF= Γ * dt =0.77* 0.47=0.365 cm.
Is it maybe Γ=0.77<1 and d(MDoF)<d(SDoF)?
Thank you!
Search found 5 matches
- 24 Oct 2023, 09:11
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Target displacement EC8
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2430
- 11 Oct 2023, 08:20
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Shear Capacity Checks
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4407
Re: Shear Capacity Checks
Why the shear capacity of a wall is different by different load pattern in pushover (Modal X+ vs Uniform X)?
- 30 Sep 2023, 13:18
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Cracked/Uncracked stiffness in RSA
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9981
Re: Cracked/Uncracked stiffness in RSA
Thank you , for the very useful information , but i don't see on any KANEPE or EC8 paragraph that "the calculation of the target displacement is with uncracked stiffness
- 27 Sep 2023, 19:14
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Cracked/Uncracked stiffness in RSA
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9981
Re: Cracked/Uncracked stiffness in RSA
If i want to run a pushover analysis , the default choice of Seismobuild is the uncracked stiffness.
The parametres E , I , change measure with each iteration of pushover or remains constant;
The parametres E , I , change measure with each iteration of pushover or remains constant;
- 21 Mar 2023, 15:10
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: analysis and results
- Replies: 9
- Views: 23013
Re: MODE SHAPES TO CALCULATE PARTICIPATION FACTORS
Hello,
In the programme "Seismobuild" is it possible not to take the mass of the basement floor ( -1) into account when conducting Eigenvalue Analysis?
Thanks in advance for your help!
In the programme "Seismobuild" is it possible not to take the mass of the basement floor ( -1) into account when conducting Eigenvalue Analysis?
Thanks in advance for your help!