Seismosoft | Earthquake Engineering Solutions

Hello,

Altoguh I can run a static pushover analysis of simple model and see the code check results , I see the "target displacemnt" values as "Zero (0)".
In fact, I defined and/or assigned all parameters and their values for TBDY (Turkish Code)" under "target displacement"-related menu ...

Hello,

Firstly, I modelled a building under SeismoBuild in a way of assigning the new values to the predefined parameters under the button "Advanced Modelling". In fact, it is clear that these predefined parameters also defines "Member Advanced Properties".

Then, I try to import this model under ...

Hello,

I purpose to make a “performance analysis” for a hybrid structural system which is constructed by use of “reinforced concrete” and “ready steel profiles”.

Is It possible to use “code-based checks” for this hybrid system in order to determine the “target performance displacement” and ...

Dear Zoi Gronti,

Thanks for your reply,

As you indicate, it is required to simultaneously activate the related level under "performance levels" in accordance with an adjustment of "seismic action (Target Spectrum)".

Hello,

I intent to change an option as:
"Seismic action (Target Spectrum)" -> "Seismic action -> code-based spectra -> TBDY related assigned parameters

but, although these parameters are assigned, the spectrum figure does not changed.

I share the steps, which is followed, with you as a pdf file ...

Hello,

when I run the input file of Example 1.2, I obtain an output with a name of "SeismoBuild_Report_E.pdf".

I check it with the existing one "Report_TBDY_rcrs2.pdf".

however, when I compare them with each other, for example for "Chord rotation capacity (θu)", I can not correctly matced them ...