Search found 10 matches
- 10 Jun 2023, 13:06
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: "Double I type 2 section – di2" causes error in static pushover analysis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1183
"Double I type 2 section – di2" causes error in static pushover analysis
Dear all, when modelling a URM building with some "Double I type 2 section – di2" steel profiles, the following error is generated when trying to run a static pushover analysis in SeismoStruct 2023 Release-2 Build-25: """ Errors detected while sending data to solver: Analysi...
- 09 Jun 2023, 10:25
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Must shell4n element be a rectangle or can it have other quadrilateral shapes?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1261
Must shell4n element be a rectangle or can it have other quadrilateral shapes?
Dear all, I am planning to use the shell4n element to model flexible floors in a masonry building in SeismoStruct 2023. My question is can this element have a trapezoid or parallelogram shape or must it be always a rectangle? The information in the help system is not clear about this. Best regards, ...
- 10 Feb 2023, 12:00
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modelling of flexible floor diaphragms in URM buildings
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2119
Re: Modelling of flexible floor diaphragms in URM buildings
Thank you for your reply. I will check SeismoStruct v2023.
- 06 Feb 2023, 17:23
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modelling of flexible floor diaphragms in URM buildings
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2119
Re: Modelling of flexible floor diaphragms in URM buildings
Thank you for the response. I have two more questions and a request for the developers: - Is there any rule of thumb to adjust the penalty coefficients of the diaphragms for a given floor stiffness? - Going either way, it means that both the vertical loads and the inertial masses/loads have to be di...
- 03 Feb 2023, 18:15
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modelling of flexible floor diaphragms in URM buildings
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2119
Modelling of flexible floor diaphragms in URM buildings
I am currently using SeismoStruct 2021 (release 3, build 2) to model a URM building with flexible floor diaphragms. I can only find references in the user manual and examples in the sample models webpage for URM buildings with rigid floor diaphragms. Any ideas how to simulate flexible floor diaphrag...
- 21 Dec 2022, 12:46
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modelling of corner walls in URM buildings with/without rigid link constraints
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1365
Modelling of corner walls in URM buildings with/without rigid link constraints
Dear all, I am working on SeismoStruct 2021 Release 3 Build 2. I am starting to model a 3D unreinforced masonry building and I have looked again at the sample models presented in this webpage: https://seismosoft.com/seismobuild-seismostruct-sample-models/ I downloaded Structure_51 and Structure_53 s...
- 17 Jun 2021, 17:39
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Information about parameters for code based checks (Material Type: mas_par)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 622
Re: Information about parameters for code based checks (Material Type: mas_par)
Dear Zoi Gronti,
thank you for pointing that out. Clearly, the information available through <F1> was insufficient.
Best regards,
Paulo Candeias
thank you for pointing that out. Clearly, the information available through <F1> was insufficient.
Best regards,
Paulo Candeias
- 17 Jun 2021, 12:56
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Misbehaviour of mas_par parameter input form
- Replies: 3
- Views: 711
Re: Misbehaviour of mas_par parameter input form
Dear Zoi Gronti, thank you for your fast reply. From my tests with this input form I can see the behaviour that you mention: whenever there is I a change in the compressive strength, the modulus of elasticity changes automatically to 1000 times that value. I also gather that I cannot use a modulus o...
- 16 Jun 2021, 18:01
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Misbehaviour of mas_par parameter input form
- Replies: 3
- Views: 711
Misbehaviour of mas_par parameter input form
Dear all, I am facing a misbehaviour in the mas_par material properties input form: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11465815/122261048-e32d1e80-cecb-11eb-8182-45ae701d7f7b.png The modulus of elasticity keeps changing values whenever I change the compressive strength (to a value multiplied ...
- 16 Jun 2021, 17:38
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Information about parameters for code based checks (Material Type: mas_par)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 622
Information about parameters for code based checks (Material Type: mas_par)
Hello all, I am working on SeismoStruct 2021 Release 3 Build 2. I am starting to explore the mas_par and the mas_tl material types for the inelastic masonry frame element. Can you indicate bibliographic references for the parameters for code based checks? For instance, I cannot establish a clear rel...