Search found 15 matches
- 20 Sep 2023, 17:18
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: Semi_active damper and equation of motion
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7326
Re: Semi_active damper and equation of motion
thank you. I understand and I already solve the problem.
- 18 Jul 2023, 03:25
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: Semi_active damper and equation of motion
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7326
Semi_active damper and equation of motion
I would like to know if there is a project ongoing to incorporate Semi_active Dampers in the software.
My second question:
For the modeling of the 2D frames under seismic loading, you integrate the equation of motion. I saw the results and checked the velocity and acceleration of the nodes of my ...
My second question:
For the modeling of the 2D frames under seismic loading, you integrate the equation of motion. I saw the results and checked the velocity and acceleration of the nodes of my ...
- 01 May 2021, 17:47
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6692
Re: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
Thank for the replay.
I can share the model with the problem by email to check what is the problem. I will share both models with viscous damper, but in 2018 with dashpot element and 2021 with link element, I got different results. by 30% on top deformation.
I can share the model with the problem by email to check what is the problem. I will share both models with viscous damper, but in 2018 with dashpot element and 2021 with link element, I got different results. by 30% on top deformation.
- 27 Apr 2021, 17:38
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6692
Re: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
Hi Seismosoft
In your 2021 seismoestruct, you have the options link element where we can select the curve model for each degree of freedom.
I chose the viscous damper curve that is available in the software option for the x and z direction with the respective damper's coefficient, and use infinite ...
In your 2021 seismoestruct, you have the options link element where we can select the curve model for each degree of freedom.
I chose the viscous damper curve that is available in the software option for the x and z direction with the respective damper's coefficient, and use infinite ...
- 25 Apr 2021, 19:04
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6692
Re: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
Hi, thank you for the support. I check it and you are right, I had a different setting. But now I have another problem. In seismoestruct 2018, I made a simulation of five floors - 3 bays RC frame with a linear viscous damper using the dashpot element. In that version of the software, the handbook ...
- 13 Apr 2021, 02:41
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6692
Re: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
I sent it. Let me know when you replay.
- 11 Apr 2021, 17:32
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6692
Re: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
I guess you have a problem with the model for the GFRP Bars, because when I make the simulation with steel reinforcement I do not have convergence problems. However, I use GFRP bar as reinforcement of concrete frames and the convergence problem arise, even when I make sure that the deformation are ...
- 11 Apr 2021, 15:47
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6692
Re: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
The problem is that without a damper (the frame with columns and beams alone) the difference is 25%, however when I apply dampers the difference is 40% on average. To eliminate errors in the model, I import the model from 2018 version to 2021 version. How can be explained the difference in the ...
- 06 Apr 2021, 07:17
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6692
Comparing seismoestruc 2018 vs 2021
I have to reproduce again a non-linear time history analysis that I did in 2018 with a concrete frame using linear viscous damper but now at 2021 software version. The problem is that I can reproduce the same structure with the new results been 1,25 times the results obtained in the 2018 version on ...
- 10 Mar 2021, 04:01
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: nonlinear time history analysis does not converge with viscous damper link
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3214
Re: nonlinear time history analysis does not converge with viscous damper link
I solved this problem too, Now my problem is that I get the peak top displacement from the RC frame (5 floors, 3 bays) at the 5 second, then the simulation continues, however at time 13 seconds the analysis stop due to "convergence problems". The problem is that I run the simulation for 20 seconds ...