Thank you once again for your reply.
I did change my elements to infrmFB elements. However, I found that it gave me convergence problems. It was resolved when I removed the self-weight of concrete and reinforcements and then applying them to the section with additional mass/length. I also found ...
Search found 6 matches
- 18 Nov 2020, 00:32
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10129
- 13 Nov 2020, 23:23
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10129
Re: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
Thank you for your reply.
I am using DB elements. My units are fine. I am not sure what do you mean by subdividing elements. Do you mean the division of elements in the element subdivision tab in the Options menu for pre-processor?
Thank you,
Dipesh
I am using DB elements. My units are fine. I am not sure what do you mean by subdividing elements. Do you mean the division of elements in the element subdivision tab in the Options menu for pre-processor?
Thank you,
Dipesh
- 12 Nov 2020, 21:41
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10129
Re: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
Thank you very much for your reply.
I have calibrated my bridge model for static analysis with the same bridge model which is modeled as grillage in SAP2000. The results are almost similar with only a 4 % difference. However, when I perform the Static Pushover analysis I am getting the failure at ...
I have calibrated my bridge model for static analysis with the same bridge model which is modeled as grillage in SAP2000. The results are almost similar with only a 4 % difference. However, when I perform the Static Pushover analysis I am getting the failure at ...
- 09 Jun 2020, 21:17
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10129
Re: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
I have defined two performance criteria for failure in steel and concrete.
I am not sure how to define performance criteria to control deflection in girder.
Could you please elaborate on how to define performance criteria to control the deflection.
I am not sure how to define performance criteria to control deflection in girder.
Could you please elaborate on how to define performance criteria to control the deflection.
- 08 Jun 2020, 19:55
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10129
Re: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
Thank you for your reply.
As I am having four girders in the bridge. I have four control nodes at the middle of the bridge for each girder.
I am doing the pushover analysis with different load cases in which I am moving trucks in the transverse direction of the bridge. So when I change the load ...
As I am having four girders in the bridge. I have four control nodes at the middle of the bridge for each girder.
I am doing the pushover analysis with different load cases in which I am moving trucks in the transverse direction of the bridge. So when I change the load ...
- 05 Jun 2020, 16:19
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10129
Static Pushover analysis on a Bridge Model.
I have modeled four girders of bridge sections and connected them with dummies. The bridge girders are in the X-Y plane. I am applying truckload in -ve Z direction and doing a pushover analysis. I had a similar model in SAP2000. I have done the calibration for linear analysis and have almost similar ...