Hi,
The user manual states that 'If users wish their infills to resist gravity loads, then they should define the latter as non-initial loads.' May I ask how could I set the gravity loads to be non-initial loads? I can't find this setting under the Aapplied Loads tab...
Best Regards,
Aslinn
Search found 9 matches
- 29 May 2020, 02:23
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Non-initial loading
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1320
- 10 May 2020, 05:04
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: RSA displacement
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2499
Re: RSA displacement
Aslinn, are you getting displacements from the "Deformed Shape Viewer" or from the "Global Response Parameters" table? At least on my computer, on which I am running SeismoStruct 2020 Release 1 Build 1, the numbers on the plot are off by the factor specified in the response spectrum definition ...
- 08 May 2020, 02:16
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: RSA displacement
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2499
RSA displacement
Hi,
I'm trying to run a RAS analysis on an unreinforced masonry building, but the result I got was very strange. I tried several spectra on two models, and both gave me extremely small displacements that are less than 3 mm.
What I did is the following:
- Under RAS parameters tab, Add standard to the ...
I'm trying to run a RAS analysis on an unreinforced masonry building, but the result I got was very strange. I tried several spectra on two models, and both gave me extremely small displacements that are less than 3 mm.
What I did is the following:
- Under RAS parameters tab, Add standard to the ...
- 30 Mar 2020, 02:00
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Short period structure
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1609
Short period structure
Hi,
I'm working on some comparative studies for pushover and dynamic time history analysis. I found one thing strange: when I have a short period structure (period around 0.2s), the pushover analysis shows very elastic behaviour with very small target displacement (less than 10mm). However, when I ...
I'm working on some comparative studies for pushover and dynamic time history analysis. I found one thing strange: when I have a short period structure (period around 0.2s), the pushover analysis shows very elastic behaviour with very small target displacement (less than 10mm). However, when I ...
- 24 Mar 2020, 06:57
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Displacement output
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3432
Re: Displacement output
Hi Zoe,
Thank you for confirming that. May I also ask if the Fy and Dy are based on MDOF or SDOF? It seems according to EC8, Fy and Dy are determined based on SDOF...so it's a bit confusing...
Best Regards,
Aslinn
Thank you for confirming that. May I also ask if the Fy and Dy are based on MDOF or SDOF? It seems according to EC8, Fy and Dy are determined based on SDOF...so it's a bit confusing...
Best Regards,
Aslinn
- 17 Mar 2020, 23:12
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Displacement output
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3432
Displacement output
Hi Seismosoft team,
EC8 gives procedure to transform an MDOF to an equivalent SDOF system. Could you please confirm if the displacement output of a pushover analysis is the SDOF system displacement or MDOF system displacement? Ie, do I need to transform it again following EC8 procedure?
Thanks!
Aslinn
EC8 gives procedure to transform an MDOF to an equivalent SDOF system. Could you please confirm if the displacement output of a pushover analysis is the SDOF system displacement or MDOF system displacement? Ie, do I need to transform it again following EC8 procedure?
Thanks!
Aslinn
- 09 Mar 2020, 01:26
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Question about mass and load
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1868
Question about mass and load
Hi,
I am a bit confused about the mass and load concepts in Seismosoft. Specifically, when should I use the lumped mass and when should I use the permanent loads? I noticed that the lumped mass would affect the frequency of the structure, while the permanent loads would not. Therefore, my ...
I am a bit confused about the mass and load concepts in Seismosoft. Specifically, when should I use the lumped mass and when should I use the permanent loads? I noticed that the lumped mass would affect the frequency of the structure, while the permanent loads would not. Therefore, my ...
- 03 Mar 2020, 08:55
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Modelling of loading bearing masonry structure
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8805
Re: Modelling of loading bearing masonry structure
Dear Zoi,
I have emailed you the model. Thank you for looking into it.
Best Regards,
Aslinn
I have emailed you the model. Thank you for looking into it.
Best Regards,
Aslinn
- 29 Feb 2020, 18:06
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Modelling of loading bearing masonry structure
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8805
Modelling of loading bearing masonry structure
Hi,
I am trying to create a simply masonry structure. I think I'm doing something wrong but I couldn't fix it. Since this is a new feature of version 2020, I couldn't find much reference. Could someone please have a look and point out where I made mistakes?
I started with a simple box of 4m x 4m x ...
I am trying to create a simply masonry structure. I think I'm doing something wrong but I couldn't fix it. Since this is a new feature of version 2020, I couldn't find much reference. Could someone please have a look and point out where I made mistakes?
I started with a simple box of 4m x 4m x ...