Seismosoft | Earthquake Engineering Solutions

I have an academic license. I need to connect and another pc but I no longer have the mail received with the key, it is possible to obtain it from the SeismoSignal software

good morning, and thanks for the quick reply. I send you one of the models. I need to export the acceleration in the x direction of the SB101 node.

yes, they are present in all models, but when you use the seismobatch 2020 function, the txt file that is extrapolated does not contain values, or rather the periods are all there, while the accallerations are all null, while in seismostruct there are . I tried to extrapolate the speed in the same w...

good morning I contact you, to request information on SEISMO BATCH 2020, 1. I tried to extrapolate the results relating to the accelerations, but although the SEISMOSTRUCT software is present, I cannot extrapolate these results from the seismobach function.

good morning, I contacted you to ask for information about some analyzes. The modeling needs led me to model each node as the composition of several nodes connected together by the rigid element: the story is characterized by el_mat material with a modulus of elasticity equal to 1E15 and specific we...

good morning, I am writing to ask you for information regarding elm_Inv error that is given to me in the analysis phase, which parameters can influence this error?

I have a doubt concerning the damping, the damping factor is expressed in percentage or must be expressed in full. If for example you want a damping equal to 1% do I have to enter 1 or 0.01 in the settings? and by inserting damping proportional to the mass, is the mass parameter automatically define...

I was doing simulations, between SAP2000 and SeismoStruct. I noticed that the 2 softwares present a minimum error in the resolution, of the eigenvalues ​​in the case of solid sections, while in the case of tubular or double-T sections the evaluation error between the two models is about 5%. Can you ...

I counted to ask, if the software, in the eigenvalue analysis, considers the mass of the element, since trying a simple tariff, frames in SAP do not find the results

the derivative that I observe is only related to permanent loads, with a small rate relative to the seismic action, amplified by 3 times compared to the real