Search found 5 matches

by juansa
24 Jul 2019, 02:20
Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
Topic: Detailed Result of Seismobuild as per ASCE 41-17
Replies: 9
Views: 17331

Re: Detailed Result of Seismobuild as per ASCE 41-17

To Seismosoft Support:
Do you have any practical example or information regarding how to use the Fardis - Biskinis formula fothe Chord Rotation?
by juansa
12 Jul 2019, 01:12
Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
Topic: Buildings with Torsional Irregularity
Replies: 2
Views: 7758

Buildings with Torsional Irregularity

I am analyzing a 2 stories building according to ASCE 41-17 and nonlinear static analysis. It is a Category I building. Using the Immediate Occupancy (1-B) and the 5% @ 50 years spectrum all elements of the building check OK for rotational, shear and displacement. The building is OK according to the...
by juansa
10 Jul 2019, 17:34
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: Cracked or Uncracked Section Properties for Non-Linear
Replies: 6
Views: 11640

Re: Cracked or Uncracked Section Properties for Non-Linear

Thank you for your answer. As I am using the Static Non-Linear Analysis and according to your answer I should use the uncracked section for the elements. Then the Eingervalue will be calculated using the uncrack section, is that correct?
by juansa
04 Jul 2019, 18:05
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: Cracked or Uncracked Section Properties for Non-Linear
Replies: 6
Views: 11640

Cracked or Uncracked Section Properties for Non-Linear

According to ASCE 41-13, section 7.3 for the linear analysis I should use the cracked section properties for the structural members. For the non-linear analysis should I use the cracked or uncracked section properties. I didn't find any information regarding this topic in the ASCE 41-13

Go to advanced search