Dear All,
I found an unexpected behaviour when modelling the slab through the automatic tool. I assign dead and live loads as requested but, when my slab is intercepting more than a single beam I don't find an agreement between the distribution of the loads in the different beams. As an example, I ...
Search found 3 matches
- 18 Oct 2018, 11:54
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Unexpected distribution of loads
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8105
- 05 Jun 2018, 13:47
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Shear Capacity Check
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8664
Re: Shear Capacity Check
Thanks for the reply, meanwhile I will modify fictitiously the spacing of the stirrups. Thanks again!
- 04 Jun 2018, 17:17
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Shear Capacity Check
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8664
Shear Capacity Check
Dear All,
I have noticed that when the software performs the shear capacity check adopts automatically a slope of the compressive strut equal to 45°. This assumption seems quite conservative. Is there any possibility fo modify the automatic option?
BR,
I have noticed that when the software performs the shear capacity check adopts automatically a slope of the compressive strut equal to 45°. This assumption seems quite conservative. Is there any possibility fo modify the automatic option?
BR,