Thank you for your answer.
I am asking because I was wondering if I make the same frame, but one with your element for infill and second one with the just one truss in the diagonal will I get the same natural period? And I didn't. Then I have tried to modify area of the truss to get the same period ...
Search found 11 matches
- 22 Dec 2017, 16:31
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Stiffnes/period of infilled frame
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5697
- 20 Dec 2017, 14:27
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Stiffnes/period of infilled frame
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5697
Re: Stiffnes/period of infilled frame
Is it possible that seismosoft team can't answer this question?
- 06 Dec 2017, 16:09
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Stiffnes/period of infilled frame
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5697
Stiffnes/period of infilled frame
Hi,
how the program takes into account stiffness of the infill panel? Is it defined through Panel thickness t and Strut Area 1? Does the program considers infill as 1, 2 or 4 diagonal struts when it calculates period of the infilled frame? Is Strut Area 1 area of the 1, 2 or 4 diagonal struts ...
how the program takes into account stiffness of the infill panel? Is it defined through Panel thickness t and Strut Area 1? Does the program considers infill as 1, 2 or 4 diagonal struts when it calculates period of the infilled frame? Is Strut Area 1 area of the 1, 2 or 4 diagonal struts ...
- 22 May 2017, 13:29
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Subdivided RC frame-wrong results
- Replies: 1
- Views: 33106
Subdivided RC frame-wrong results
Hi,
i have modeled a simple case of static pushover analysis of RC frame. I have made two models:
1. With 3 elements (two columns and one beam)
2. I have used command to subdivide these elements on 5 parts each.
First, this command has a bug. It gives a wrong name to some nodes and thus connects ...
i have modeled a simple case of static pushover analysis of RC frame. I have made two models:
1. With 3 elements (two columns and one beam)
2. I have used command to subdivide these elements on 5 parts each.
First, this command has a bug. It gives a wrong name to some nodes and thus connects ...
- 10 May 2017, 17:19
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modeling the spring
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13687
Re: Modeling the spring
Ok. I have done this. Added 4 link elements in 4 nodes. But the problem is that I want to define stiffness of the Link/spring in just F1 and F3 direction, and it seems that in this way infill element doesn't get activated, because M2 stiffness is 0.
Is it necessary to define M2 stiffnessin order to ...
Is it necessary to define M2 stiffnessin order to ...
- 04 May 2017, 08:58
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modeling the spring
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13687
Re: Modeling the spring
Thank you for your answer.
Is it possible to add springs/links in this way all around the infill wall?
To explain in more details. I would like to model the frame connected to the infill wall with the springs, but with for example 10 springs on each of four sides. In that way, as explained in note ...
Is it possible to add springs/links in this way all around the infill wall?
To explain in more details. I would like to model the frame connected to the infill wall with the springs, but with for example 10 springs on each of four sides. In that way, as explained in note ...
- 02 May 2017, 09:20
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modeling the spring
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13687
Re: Modeling the spring
Hi,
if I understood right:
- node 1 should be node of the frame
- node 2 should be node coincidental to the node 1
- node 1 and 2 are connected with the link
- node 4 is node of the infill element
- node 3 should be node coincidental to the node 4
- node 3 and 4 are connected with the link
- node ...
if I understood right:
- node 1 should be node of the frame
- node 2 should be node coincidental to the node 1
- node 1 and 2 are connected with the link
- node 4 is node of the infill element
- node 3 should be node coincidental to the node 4
- node 3 and 4 are connected with the link
- node ...
- 26 Apr 2017, 14:34
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modeling the spring
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13687
Re: Modeling the spring
Thanks!
I have tried this, but it is not working.
I am modelling RC frame with infill wall and I want to model springs between infill panel and frame. In SeismoStruct user manual on page 375 you wrote:
NOTE 3: In very refined models, users may wish to introduce link elements between the frame and ...
I have tried this, but it is not working.
I am modelling RC frame with infill wall and I want to model springs between infill panel and frame. In SeismoStruct user manual on page 375 you wrote:
NOTE 3: In very refined models, users may wish to introduce link elements between the frame and ...
- 24 Apr 2017, 08:14
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Modeling the spring
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13687
Modeling the spring
Hi,
I would like to connect 2 joints with the spring. I saw a possibility to model it with the link elements, but if I understood right for link elements only coincidential nodes can be aasigned. I have 2 joints that don't have the same coordinates. Is there a possibility in Seismostruct to model ...
I would like to connect 2 joints with the spring. I saw a possibility to model it with the link elements, but if I understood right for link elements only coincidential nodes can be aasigned. I have 2 joints that don't have the same coordinates. Is there a possibility in Seismostruct to model ...
- 27 Sep 2016, 16:31
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Link connection between frame and infill
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5604
Re: Link connection between frame and infill
I understand what I was doing wrong.
Thank you for the answer!
Thank you for the answer!