Dear Zoi Gronti
thank you for your kind reply.
I know that it is possible to deactivate an element by setting the deactivation time, however, in my model I have many links of the type described above so I can't know which of them reaches the failure first, therefore it is not easy to set a ...
Search found 12 matches
- 19 May 2021, 15:31
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Link elements deactivation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2408
- 19 May 2021, 09:17
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Link elements deactivation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2408
Link elements deactivation
Dear SeismoSoft and SeismoStruct users
I’m modelling a precast RC industrial building.
It is a simple one storey building, with cantilever columns, beams and prestressed roof element (wing/V-shaped beam).
In particular, I modelled the connection between roof elements and the supporting beam ...
I’m modelling a precast RC industrial building.
It is a simple one storey building, with cantilever columns, beams and prestressed roof element (wing/V-shaped beam).
In particular, I modelled the connection between roof elements and the supporting beam ...
- 21 Feb 2020, 10:46
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: A sliding steel connection
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1168
A sliding steel connection
Dear Seismosoft community,
I’m trying to model with SeismoStruct a panel-to-structure connection in one-storey RC precast building with vertical panels.
To extremely simplify the numerical model I modelled only one column and one panel connected at the top with a link element, as depicted in the ...
I’m trying to model with SeismoStruct a panel-to-structure connection in one-storey RC precast building with vertical panels.
To extremely simplify the numerical model I modelled only one column and one panel connected at the top with a link element, as depicted in the ...
- 01 Sep 2017, 20:35
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Elements' axial force evaluation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4654
Elements' axial force evaluation
Dear Seismosoft community
I have a question about axial force in the elements.
I modelled in Seismostruct a cantilever beam with a 0.4x0.4m RC section, height 5m and a summit axial load equal to 10 Kn.
So, by hand calculation, we have that the distributed weight of beam is 0.4x0.4x25=4kN/m and ...
I have a question about axial force in the elements.
I modelled in Seismostruct a cantilever beam with a 0.4x0.4m RC section, height 5m and a summit axial load equal to 10 Kn.
So, by hand calculation, we have that the distributed weight of beam is 0.4x0.4x25=4kN/m and ...
- 07 Dec 2015, 09:55
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Distribution of base shear forces
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7790
Re: Distribution of base shear forces
Thank you huffte for your answer and your precious help.
Best luck you too
Best luck you too
- 05 Dec 2015, 16:31
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Distribution of base shear forces
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7790
Re: Distribution of base shear forces
Thank you for your timely and detailed answer.
Can you suggest me some litrature references where i can better study the theme??
Best regards
Giovanni
Can you suggest me some litrature references where i can better study the theme??
Best regards
Giovanni
- 05 Dec 2015, 14:06
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Distribution of base shear forces
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7790
Re: Distribution of base shear forces
In order to study this issue i realized a simple structure with two columns (Heigth 10m) fully restrained at the base and connected at the top with a rigid rod, the loads applied are shown in figure:
http://i65.tinypic.com/kedg9k.jpg
The two columns are identical and composed with a inelastic FB ...
http://i65.tinypic.com/kedg9k.jpg
The two columns are identical and composed with a inelastic FB ...
- 05 Dec 2015, 13:54
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Distribution of base shear forces
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7790
Distribution of base shear forces
Dear SeismoSoft Support
I have to perform some time history dynamic analysis in a prefabricated single-storey building realized with 3 row of columns and rigid roof that i modelled with a rigid diaphragm, how you can see in the figure below:
http://i66.tinypic.com/2udw5f5.jpg
The distributed beam ...
I have to perform some time history dynamic analysis in a prefabricated single-storey building realized with 3 row of columns and rigid roof that i modelled with a rigid diaphragm, how you can see in the figure below:
http://i66.tinypic.com/2udw5f5.jpg
The distributed beam ...
- 30 Aug 2014, 18:28
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Second order effects
- Replies: 10
- Views: 11201
Re: Second order effects
<t>Thank you huffte for your help.<br/>
<br/>
I took my cantilever beam, and subdivided it in 25 elements then I did some tests:<br/>
<br/>
P=100 kN M=10 kNm<br/>
top x disp.:<br/>
hand calc: 0,1948m<br/>
sesimo calc: 0,1944m<br/>
<br/>
P=120 kN M=12 kNm<br/>
top x disp.:<br/>
hand calc: 0,3402m<br ...
<br/>
I took my cantilever beam, and subdivided it in 25 elements then I did some tests:<br/>
<br/>
P=100 kN M=10 kNm<br/>
top x disp.:<br/>
hand calc: 0,1948m<br/>
sesimo calc: 0,1944m<br/>
<br/>
P=120 kN M=12 kNm<br/>
top x disp.:<br/>
hand calc: 0,3402m<br ...
- 30 Aug 2014, 12:18
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Second order effects
- Replies: 10
- Views: 11201
Re: Second order effects
<r>Hi huffte<br/>
Well, I try to explain the closed form solution that I used for my non linear hand claculation<br/>
With reference to the follow figure<br/>
<URL url="http://it.tinypic.com/r/jqjqjk/8"><s>[url]</s>http://it.tinypic.com/r/jqjqjk/8<e>[/url]</e></URL><br/>
we can write the external ...
Well, I try to explain the closed form solution that I used for my non linear hand claculation<br/>
With reference to the follow figure<br/>
<URL url="http://it.tinypic.com/r/jqjqjk/8"><s>[url]</s>http://it.tinypic.com/r/jqjqjk/8<e>[/url]</e></URL><br/>
we can write the external ...