<t>Dear seismosoft,<br/>
The results that i paste at the first topic referred at the scale factor 0,1. the wrong values exist from the beginning of the analysis. However, i have run other analysis with less steps and in any case the size of the result file was less than 2GB. the results continues to ...
Search found 7 matches
- 03 Oct 2014, 18:09
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: IDA_results
- Replies: 11
- Views: 11726
- 03 Oct 2014, 16:33
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: IDA_results
- Replies: 11
- Views: 11726
Re: IDA_results
Dear Seismosoft, i send the project file.
Many thanks
Many thanks
- 03 Oct 2014, 13:43
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: IDA_results
- Replies: 11
- Views: 11726
IDA_results
<t>hi, i modeled one 3 storey RC building and i run an incremental dynamic analysis. my model is really complicate. However, the results of IDA are really weird. Here are the resulst from the performance criteria check. Anything thoughts?<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
C7A 0, 22,26 Not reached yet<br/>
C8A -6 ...
<br/>
<br/>
C7A 0, 22,26 Not reached yet<br/>
C8A -6 ...
- 25 Sep 2014, 15:47
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: no descending branch
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10626
Re: no descending branch
<t>Dear huffte,<br/>
1.i have used different concrete materials because i need to simulate the different confinement factor that elements have.the properties are comparable but i wanted to be accurate.<br/>
2. of course my reinforcement patterns are unusual, but the elements that i modules are aimed ...
1.i have used different concrete materials because i need to simulate the different confinement factor that elements have.the properties are comparable but i wanted to be accurate.<br/>
2. of course my reinforcement patterns are unusual, but the elements that i modules are aimed ...
- 25 Sep 2014, 01:45
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: no descending branch
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10626
no descending branch
<t>i added R/C walls in a 3 storey building (in order to retrofit it) and i moduled it with seismostruct. i am trying to run pushover analysis but numerical difficulties do not allow the finish of the analysis. although it is not exist any failure that will challenge the total collapse of building ...
- 15 May 2014, 20:40
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: fbd_ite
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8548
Re: fbd_ite
Thank you very much for your answer Huffte. it is a logical answer. I have one more question. i have define the target diplacement as the three percent of the total height of the structure(3%htotal). what criteria should i choose to define the target diplacement??
- 15 May 2014, 18:02
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: fbd_ite
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8548
fbd_ite
<t>i am doing a pushover analysis in a 3 storey bulding, and i face substantial numerical difficulties. Specifically I have used a large number of link element for the simoulation of the node. I applied any advice mentioned on the forum but still face significant numerical problems. any tip to ...