Search found 7 matches

by manousos
03 Oct 2014, 18:09
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: IDA_results
Replies: 11
Views: 5728

Re: IDA_results

<t>Dear seismosoft,<br/> The results that i paste at the first topic referred at the scale factor 0,1. the wrong values exist from the beginning of the analysis. However, i have run other analysis with less steps and in any case the size of the result file was less than 2GB. the results continues to...
by manousos
03 Oct 2014, 16:33
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: IDA_results
Replies: 11
Views: 5728

Re: IDA_results

Dear Seismosoft, i send the project file.

Many thanks
by manousos
03 Oct 2014, 13:43
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: IDA_results
Replies: 11
Views: 5728

IDA_results

<t>hi, i modeled one 3 storey RC building and i run an incremental dynamic analysis. my model is really complicate. However, the results of IDA are really weird. Here are the resulst from the performance criteria check. Anything thoughts?<br/> <br/> <br/> C7A 0, 22,26 Not reached yet<br/> C8A -6,198...
by manousos
25 Sep 2014, 15:47
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: no descending branch
Replies: 8
Views: 6622

Re: no descending branch

<t>Dear huffte,<br/> 1.i have used different concrete materials because i need to simulate the different confinement factor that elements have.the properties are comparable but i wanted to be accurate.<br/> 2. of course my reinforcement patterns are unusual, but the elements that i modules are aimed...
by manousos
25 Sep 2014, 01:45
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: no descending branch
Replies: 8
Views: 6622

no descending branch

<t>i added R/C walls in a 3 storey building (in order to retrofit it) and i moduled it with seismostruct. i am trying to run pushover analysis but numerical difficulties do not allow the finish of the analysis. although it is not exist any failure that will challenge the total collapse of building, ...
by manousos
15 May 2014, 20:40
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: fbd_ite
Replies: 8
Views: 5894

Re: fbd_ite

Thank you very much for your answer Huffte. it is a logical answer. I have one more question. i have define the target diplacement as the three percent of the total height of the structure(3%htotal). what criteria should i choose to define the target diplacement??
by manousos
15 May 2014, 18:02
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: fbd_ite
Replies: 8
Views: 5894

fbd_ite

<t>i am doing a pushover analysis in a 3 storey bulding, and i face substantial numerical difficulties. Specifically I have used a large number of link element for the simoulation of the node. I applied any advice mentioned on the forum but still face significant numerical problems. any tip to overc...

Go to advanced search