Questions on Shear Failure Representation and Torsional Stress Transfer in RC Wall Modelling
Posted: 03 Mar 2026, 08:30
Dear SeismoStruct Support Team,
I am a structural engineer currently studying building performance under seismic loading. I would appreciate the clarification on the following two technical aspects:
1. Shear Inelasticity
When an element has undergone shear hinging that exceeds the limit defined according to design codes, the element essentially softens and its stiffness is significantly reduced.
Question: How does SeismoStruct handle element loss/failure during the analysis particularly shear degradation? Does the element still exist numerically with a very low stiffness, allowing shear forces to be redistributed to other redundant elements in the structure?
2. Torsional Stresses at U-shaped RC Walls
I noticed that an efficient way of modelling RC walls to account for inelasticity is to use inelastic frame force-based elements (infrmFB), where the node is located at the centre of the wall. When modelling a U-shaped wall using this approach, rigid links are automatically generated to connect the centres of the three wall panels.
Question: Does SeismoStruct capture the stresses that are transferred at the wall corners through this modelling strategy, or is it necessary to explicitly assign nodes at the corners for SeismoStruct to capture these effects accurately?
Appreciate your time addressing these questions. Thank you.
I am a structural engineer currently studying building performance under seismic loading. I would appreciate the clarification on the following two technical aspects:
1. Shear Inelasticity
When an element has undergone shear hinging that exceeds the limit defined according to design codes, the element essentially softens and its stiffness is significantly reduced.
Question: How does SeismoStruct handle element loss/failure during the analysis particularly shear degradation? Does the element still exist numerically with a very low stiffness, allowing shear forces to be redistributed to other redundant elements in the structure?
2. Torsional Stresses at U-shaped RC Walls
I noticed that an efficient way of modelling RC walls to account for inelasticity is to use inelastic frame force-based elements (infrmFB), where the node is located at the centre of the wall. When modelling a U-shaped wall using this approach, rigid links are automatically generated to connect the centres of the three wall panels.
Question: Does SeismoStruct capture the stresses that are transferred at the wall corners through this modelling strategy, or is it necessary to explicitly assign nodes at the corners for SeismoStruct to capture these effects accurately?
Appreciate your time addressing these questions. Thank you.