errors in doubly embedded beam and portal
Posted: 16 Feb 2018, 15:57
hello,
I would have to present some problems: I noticed that even on simple elements, such as a doubly embedded beam subjected to uniformly distributed vertical load, the program provides very different results changing the number of frames in which the beam element is divided (with only one element does not even provide the correct stress and strain outputs in the integration sections). It also provides a normal stress value different from zero, despite the type of load, this means that the breaking load of the beam is much higher than expected.
Finally, from the study of a portal with the concrete "con_ma" there were problems related to the lack of equilibrium at the nodes and also in this case a considerable difference between the results provided using only one frame or multiple for the beam.
in all cases I have modeled the elements as "inelastic frames based on forces" for which it should not be necessary to divide the elements into several parts.
thanks for your time!
I would have to present some problems: I noticed that even on simple elements, such as a doubly embedded beam subjected to uniformly distributed vertical load, the program provides very different results changing the number of frames in which the beam element is divided (with only one element does not even provide the correct stress and strain outputs in the integration sections). It also provides a normal stress value different from zero, despite the type of load, this means that the breaking load of the beam is much higher than expected.
Finally, from the study of a portal with the concrete "con_ma" there were problems related to the lack of equilibrium at the nodes and also in this case a considerable difference between the results provided using only one frame or multiple for the beam.
in all cases I have modeled the elements as "inelastic frames based on forces" for which it should not be necessary to divide the elements into several parts.
thanks for your time!