Seismo Struct - Deck Loading
Posted: 07 Jun 2015, 22:20
Dear Seismo Members,
I modeled a composite bridge using SeismoStruct and it was straight forward compared with other softwares I used in the past. However, I have faced few challenges that made me drop the model to look for an alternative programme. Seeing this forum live and kicking, someone may be able to give me tips that will help me resume form where I stopped.
1. Modelling Live Loadings, I need to load the deck. In some software you can create a deck surface that allows point or uniform loads to be placed anywhere within the deck. Seismo loading seems to be restricted to the nodes and elements. When dealing with many load cases, the idea of manually calculating load distribution to the members or nodes is cumbersome. Please advise if there is a tool that allows loading anywhere in the deck.
2. Usually with other software analysis, I use excel to check the detail of the output results. It is easier to filter and extract the relevant data, with Seismo the output was not easy to manipulate (that was the experience with the few attempts). Any advice or pointers on the input/output of data used in Seismo.
Many Thanks
AOsman
I modeled a composite bridge using SeismoStruct and it was straight forward compared with other softwares I used in the past. However, I have faced few challenges that made me drop the model to look for an alternative programme. Seeing this forum live and kicking, someone may be able to give me tips that will help me resume form where I stopped.
1. Modelling Live Loadings, I need to load the deck. In some software you can create a deck surface that allows point or uniform loads to be placed anywhere within the deck. Seismo loading seems to be restricted to the nodes and elements. When dealing with many load cases, the idea of manually calculating load distribution to the members or nodes is cumbersome. Please advise if there is a tool that allows loading anywhere in the deck.
2. Usually with other software analysis, I use excel to check the detail of the output results. It is easier to filter and extract the relevant data, with Seismo the output was not easy to manipulate (that was the experience with the few attempts). Any advice or pointers on the input/output of data used in Seismo.
Many Thanks
AOsman