You need to check the restraints in the nodes of the link elements. Furthermore, you need to connect the beam elements to the internal x1 & x2 nodes of the links rather than the restrained external nodes.
Seismosoft Support
RC JOINTS- Shear panel modelling
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 01 Jan 2021, 06:04
Re: RC JOINTS- Shear panel modelling
I am not able to understand what you are trying to explanation.
- seismosoft
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 04:55
Re: RC JOINTS- Shear panel modelling
There is a problem with the connection of the link and frame elements, they are not connected in series.
However, explaining how to model structures in FE is out of the scope of this forum. This is probably an issue that can be better discussed with your supoervisor.
Seismosoft Support
However, explaining how to model structures in FE is out of the scope of this forum. This is probably an issue that can be better discussed with your supoervisor.
Seismosoft Support
Re: RC JOINTS- Shear panel modelling
Is it possible for you to send me the Yu dissertation to :roshen.rj@gmail.com as I am interested in modeling the bar slip and I do not find the dissertation anywhereRalazem wrote: ↑05 Oct 2020, 01:22 In the Yu dissertation, there are 3 important things that were considered in the joint model:
1) Bar slip springs
2) interface shear spring
3) shear panel rotational spring
All the parameters were provided as well. The models provided by seismostruct only accounted for the first 2, and I need to know why the third was not considered, and if I were to add it on to the existing seismostruct verification models for this paper, how does it need to be applied in the relation to the other parameters?
Otherwise, what is the justification of not including it in the model?