Search found 11 matches

by lacampos3
09 May 2014, 17:25
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: "Range Check Error" Seismostruct v5.2.1
Replies: 25
Views: 36799

Re: "Range Check Error" Seismostruct v5.2.1

<t>Dear Seismosoft,<br/>
<br/>
I am getting the Range Check Error when running an eigenvalue analysis. I have tried changing the compatibility settings. Furthermore, when I try replicating the model in a new Seismostruct instance, I get the following error in the materials module: "Access violation ...
by lacampos3
05 May 2014, 20:11
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: Computing cross section
Replies: 0
Views: 5814

Computing cross section

<t>Dear Seismosoft support,<br/>
<br/>
On the verification report Ch4-blind-02A file, user defined element frames are used to model the slab. How did you determine the indicated section properties for viga_1? EA=1,170,000kN, EI=975kN-m^2, EI=78975kN-m^2<br/>
<br/>
Using these properties, I back ...
by lacampos3
17 Sep 2013, 02:04
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: Computing mass/length
Replies: 4
Views: 4173

Re: Computing mass/length

Thanks a lot huffte. Your comments clarify many of the questions I had.
by lacampos3
17 Sep 2013, 00:20
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: Computing mass/length
Replies: 4
Views: 4173

Re: Computing mass/length

<t>Antonioacorreia,<br/>
<br/>
Thank you for your response. In order to corroborate the mass/length value of 0.23, I defined a section of 0.9x0.1m and used it to create the element class. In other words, instead of creating a user defined element class, I used an already defined section to obtain ...
by lacampos3
10 Sep 2013, 16:37
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: Computing mass/length
Replies: 4
Views: 4173

Computing mass/length

Dear Seismosoft support,

On the verification report Ch4-blind-02A file, user defined element frames are used to model the slab. How did you obtain the mass/length for viga 1 (0.23 ton/m)?

Thanks.
by lacampos3
02 Jun 2013, 21:25
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Not obtaining same results on verification report
Replies: 1
Views: 2219

Not obtaining same results on verification report

<t>Dear Seismostruct Support,<br/>
<br/>
I am running the program titled "Ch4-blind-02A" on the verification report and am not obtaining the same top nodal displacement (at Top_2) curve as that displayed in the verification report. For the first 40 seconds, the max. top displacement I get is about ...
by lacampos3
12 Mar 2013, 18:13
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
Replies: 9
Views: 6518

Re: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration

<t>Dear Seismosoft support,<br/>
<br/>
Your first point is well taken. I modified the program and deleted the self-weight of the lumped mass and set the specific weight = 0 in the materials module.<br/>
<br/>
As far as the acceleration units, my accelogram is in g so I multiplied it by 9810 to ...
by lacampos3
04 Mar 2013, 19:54
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
Replies: 9
Views: 6518

Re: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration

Great. I just sent you my program.

Thanks.
by lacampos3
02 Mar 2013, 17:09
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
Replies: 9
Views: 6518

Re: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration

Is there any way you could forward me your program so I can see what I'm doing wrong?

Thank you so much for your help.
by lacampos3
20 Feb 2013, 21:01
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
Replies: 9
Views: 6518

Re: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration

Well, it seems that if we have a rotational mass at the top, it wouldn't be able to induce any shear(Fx) nor a moment in the y axis (My).

Thanks.

Go to advanced search