<t>Dear Seismosoft,<br/>
<br/>
I am getting the Range Check Error when running an eigenvalue analysis. I have tried changing the compatibility settings. Furthermore, when I try replicating the model in a new Seismostruct instance, I get the following error in the materials module: "Access violation ...
Search found 11 matches
- 09 May 2014, 17:25
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: "Range Check Error" Seismostruct v5.2.1
- Replies: 25
- Views: 36799
- 05 May 2014, 20:11
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Computing cross section
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5814
Computing cross section
<t>Dear Seismosoft support,<br/>
<br/>
On the verification report Ch4-blind-02A file, user defined element frames are used to model the slab. How did you determine the indicated section properties for viga_1? EA=1,170,000kN, EI=975kN-m^2, EI=78975kN-m^2<br/>
<br/>
Using these properties, I back ...
<br/>
On the verification report Ch4-blind-02A file, user defined element frames are used to model the slab. How did you determine the indicated section properties for viga_1? EA=1,170,000kN, EI=975kN-m^2, EI=78975kN-m^2<br/>
<br/>
Using these properties, I back ...
- 17 Sep 2013, 02:04
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Computing mass/length
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4173
Re: Computing mass/length
Thanks a lot huffte. Your comments clarify many of the questions I had.
- 17 Sep 2013, 00:20
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Computing mass/length
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4173
Re: Computing mass/length
<t>Antonioacorreia,<br/>
<br/>
Thank you for your response. In order to corroborate the mass/length value of 0.23, I defined a section of 0.9x0.1m and used it to create the element class. In other words, instead of creating a user defined element class, I used an already defined section to obtain ...
<br/>
Thank you for your response. In order to corroborate the mass/length value of 0.23, I defined a section of 0.9x0.1m and used it to create the element class. In other words, instead of creating a user defined element class, I used an already defined section to obtain ...
- 10 Sep 2013, 16:37
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Computing mass/length
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4173
Computing mass/length
Dear Seismosoft support,
On the verification report Ch4-blind-02A file, user defined element frames are used to model the slab. How did you obtain the mass/length for viga 1 (0.23 ton/m)?
Thanks.
On the verification report Ch4-blind-02A file, user defined element frames are used to model the slab. How did you obtain the mass/length for viga 1 (0.23 ton/m)?
Thanks.
- 02 Jun 2013, 21:25
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Not obtaining same results on verification report
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2219
Not obtaining same results on verification report
<t>Dear Seismostruct Support,<br/>
<br/>
I am running the program titled "Ch4-blind-02A" on the verification report and am not obtaining the same top nodal displacement (at Top_2) curve as that displayed in the verification report. For the first 40 seconds, the max. top displacement I get is about ...
<br/>
I am running the program titled "Ch4-blind-02A" on the verification report and am not obtaining the same top nodal displacement (at Top_2) curve as that displayed in the verification report. For the first 40 seconds, the max. top displacement I get is about ...
- 12 Mar 2013, 18:13
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6518
Re: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
<t>Dear Seismosoft support,<br/>
<br/>
Your first point is well taken. I modified the program and deleted the self-weight of the lumped mass and set the specific weight = 0 in the materials module.<br/>
<br/>
As far as the acceleration units, my accelogram is in g so I multiplied it by 9810 to ...
<br/>
Your first point is well taken. I modified the program and deleted the self-weight of the lumped mass and set the specific weight = 0 in the materials module.<br/>
<br/>
As far as the acceleration units, my accelogram is in g so I multiplied it by 9810 to ...
- 04 Mar 2013, 19:54
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6518
Re: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
Great. I just sent you my program.
Thanks.
Thanks.
- 02 Mar 2013, 17:09
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6518
Re: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
Is there any way you could forward me your program so I can see what I'm doing wrong?
Thank you so much for your help.
Thank you so much for your help.
- 20 Feb 2013, 21:01
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6518
Re: Rotational Mass and Translational Acceleration
Well, it seems that if we have a rotational mass at the top, it wouldn't be able to induce any shear(Fx) nor a moment in the y axis (My).
Thanks.
Thanks.
