Search found 969 matches

by huffte
29 Nov 2023, 19:39
Forum: 02-Analytical capabilities
Topic: Difference Between Seismosignal and Seismosignal 3D
Replies: 3
Views: 67

Re: Difference Between Seismosignal and Seismosignal 3D

Yes, that is correct. By directional spectra I mean the orientation-dependent rotated component spectra (RotDxx).
by huffte
26 Nov 2023, 21:46
Forum: 02-Analytical capabilities
Topic: Difference Between Seismosignal and Seismosignal 3D
Replies: 3
Views: 67

Re: Difference Between Seismosignal and Seismosignal 3D

SeismoSignal3D will produce directional spectra, as you have noted. SeismoSignal3D does not have the capability of producing either (a) response history analyses for SDOF systems found in SeismoSignal or (b) inelastic spectra found in SeismoSignal. I have found both programs to be extremely useful a...
by huffte
18 Nov 2023, 22:39
Forum: 02-Analytical capabilities
Topic: vertical component of synthetic accelerograms
Replies: 3
Views: 102

Re: vertical component of synthetic accelerograms

As long as the defined target response spectrum is a vertical component response spectrum, there is no reason that SeismoArtif wouldn't work very well. So the key will be coming up with the appropriate vertical target spectrum. In the past, vertical spectra were taken to be 2/3 of the horizontal geo...
by huffte
16 Nov 2023, 16:47
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: one modeling problem
Replies: 3
Views: 108

Re: one modeling problem

Simply define separate material properties for each in the "Materials" tab and choose the appropriate "Reinforced Concrete" section in the "Sections" tab. Each of the reinforced concrete sections permits the use of different materials for the stirrups (transverse reinfo...
by huffte
04 Oct 2023, 21:46
Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
Topic: Theory II. Order
Replies: 1
Views: 107

Re: Theory II. Order

I will suggest the section of the SeismoStruct Help System quoted below as a starting point. I hope this helps. "Geometric Nonlinearity Large displacements/rotations and large independent deformations relative to the frame element's chord (also known as P-Delta effects) are taken into account i...
by huffte
04 Oct 2023, 21:41
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: RC beam-column joint
Replies: 14
Views: 8710

Re: RC beam-column joint

Good question. I wonder if you might be able to estimate the tension load required to result in pullout of the bar with inadequate development? You could convert this to a pullout stress and strain, specify a bar with a fracture strain equal to the pullout strain, and specify drop load in the perfor...
by huffte
08 Sep 2023, 18:00
Forum: 03-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Multiple Envelope Definitions
Replies: 1
Views: 234

Multiple Envelope Definitions

It appears that SeismoArtif is only using the first Envelope Shape definition in the Accelerogram Generation tab during the Artificial Accelerogram Generation method. I define several envelope shapes and tried to generate two accelerograms for each shape. The first envelope shape produces great reco...
by huffte
27 Aug 2023, 18:25
Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
Topic: Zig-Zag in pushover curve
Replies: 1
Views: 296

Re: Zig-Zag in pushover curve

In my experience, this is not unusual. It is likely that the first drop in load constitutes the failure point, even though collapse is not yet imminent at that point. It could be that one plastic hinge has formed and load is redistributed through the structure. Of course, you will have to determine ...
by huffte
05 Aug 2023, 21:31
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: Element Classes
Replies: 4
Views: 299

Re: Element Classes

I believe that with the infrmDBPH element, inelastic end behavior is determined solely from the cross section properties. For the elastic frame element with hinges. explicit definition of the rotational springs is required and is completely independent of the cross section properties of the member.
by huffte
17 Jul 2023, 15:51
Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
Topic: Unable to apply the next load step in dynamic time-history
Replies: 7
Views: 421

Re: Unable to apply the next load step in dynamic time-history

Have you estimated the displacement demand on the structure due to the selected earthquake record? It could be that the loading history is too severe for the model to withstand. Can you try applying a factor less than 1.0 to the specified acceleration history to lessen the load and see if the model ...

Go to advanced search