Search found 2351 matches

by seismosoft
16 May 2023, 10:38
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Reistent bending moment calculation
Replies: 1
Views: 179

Re: Reistent bending moment calculation

Can you please be a bit more specific? With 'resistent bending moment' you mean the capacity of the T-shaped beams in the bending moments, code-based checks? We checked the program and it seems that the bending moments are calculated correctly. Note that one factor that might confuse you is the rein...
by seismosoft
16 May 2023, 10:33
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: resistive moment inversion
Replies: 1
Views: 177

Re: resistive moment inversion

Can you please be a bit more specific? With 'resistant moment' you mean the capacity of the T-shaped beams in the bending moments, code-based checks? We checked the program and it seems that the bending moments are calculated correctly. Note that one factor that might confuse you is the reinforcemen...
by seismosoft
16 May 2023, 10:18
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Numerical instabilities on a steel braced frame
Replies: 2
Views: 238

Re: Numerical instabilities on a steel braced frame

If you carry out a search in this forum with terms like convergence, divergence or numerical instability, you will find numerous posts on this issue. You will also find a section on the Users' Manual on how to solve numerical problems (Appendix A). Diverging solution is an inherent feature/problem o...
by seismosoft
11 May 2023, 11:05
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: High Normal forces in beams
Replies: 7
Views: 273

Re: High Normal forces in beams

It depends.
In most cases however the rigid diaphragm is an important structural characteristic that cannot be omitted.
Seismosoft Support
by seismosoft
08 May 2023, 17:17
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Problems in simulating cyclic behaviour of RC shear wall with wall shoes connector
Replies: 6
Views: 270

Re: Problems in simulating cyclic behaviour of RC shear wall with wall shoes connector

You need to check the state of the member cross section, in order to understand if it is a structural failure or not. This can be done by checking the curvatures, but mainly by setting stress point, so that to understand if the member can sustain more loads or not.
Seismosoft Support
by seismosoft
25 Apr 2023, 14:46
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Problems in simulating cyclic behaviour of RC shear wall with wall shoes connector
Replies: 6
Views: 270

Re: Problems in simulating cyclic behaviour of RC shear wall with wall shoes connector

It obviously is a convergence problem. Make sure that the model is appropriately restrained (run an eigenvalue analysis and check the modes for this) and that it can withstand the loads applied (you need to check the applied loads and the internal loads of the elements before divergence and see how ...
by seismosoft
24 Apr 2023, 13:52
Forum: 01-Installation of new versions
Topic: Troubleshooting Seismosignal on Windows 11
Replies: 2
Views: 247

Re: Troubleshooting Seismosignal on Windows 11

Milad_m2,

It is good that you sorted this out, however note that the resolution should not be the problem. I am using SeismoSignal in my PC with a 3840x2400 resolution without any problems.

Seismosoft Support
by seismosoft
24 Apr 2023, 10:14
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: High Normal forces in beams
Replies: 7
Views: 273

Re: High Normal forces in beams

Probably it is better to carry out the shear checks of the beams neglecting the axial forces applied on them, by selecting the corresponding project setting.
Seismosoft Support
by seismosoft
21 Apr 2023, 12:34
Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
Topic: Acting bending moment greater than ultimate (plastic) bending moment
Replies: 7
Views: 271

Re: Acting bending moment greater than ultimate (plastic) bending moment

Salvatorebenfratello hi, We carried out a check with a cantilever with the infrmFB element class and the results come out reasonable, i.e. fy=fu=247-248kN. We also checked the dimensions of the HEA280 section and they are correct. Note the following: 1) Our nonlinear implementation of the HEA280 sec...
by seismosoft
21 Mar 2023, 16:56
Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
Topic: Modeling Pushover of Masonry Wall
Replies: 2
Views: 246

Re: Modeling Pushover of Masonry Wall

Can it be that you have the Run with Linear Elastic Properties checked (Program Settings>Analysis tab)?
If this is not the case, problably the structural deformations are very small and the response is indeed linear.
Seismosoft support

Go to advanced search