From your description, I am not sure if you changed something in the model from SeismoBuild and SeismoStruct.
In general, both programs should give the same results with the same parameters.
Seismosoft Support
Search found 2109 matches
- 22 Jan 2021, 08:49
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Different results in seismostruct and seismobuild
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8
- 20 Jan 2021, 14:40
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: about verification reports examples (RC joint)
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6510
Re: about verification reports examples (RC joint)
Shahdhruviajay, Seismosoft cannot provide personalised support to all our free academic users (they are thousands), this is simply impossible. All these problems of your should probably discussed be with your supervisor. If you have specific questions on the model, we will be happy to assist you. In...
- 20 Jan 2021, 14:35
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Pushover analysis of underground floors
- Replies: 1
- Views: 16
Re: Pushover analysis of underground floors
Hi Pedro, As Fanis must have explained, applying lateral incremental forces in the basement is a conservative, because there is no clear concensus between the Standards on how to deal with this issue. Regarding the failure of the basement walls, it is not unlikely to happen, especially in older cons...
- 17 Jan 2021, 12:27
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: Suggestion: Displaying Link Elements Properties
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9
Re: Suggestion: Displaying Link Elements Properties
Thank you for your suggestion. Indeed this is one of the features that we plan to develop in future versions of the program.
Seismosoft Support
Seismosoft Support
- 17 Jan 2021, 12:26
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: Suggestion: A program that displays multiple results
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9
Re: Suggestion: A program that displays multiple results
Thank you for your suggestions, which we will consider in the development of new versions in the future. All the same, note that SeismoBatch, apart from running multiple spf files, is capable of extracting most of the results drived (displacements, element forces etc) from all the analyses and writi...
- 13 Jan 2021, 12:16
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: RC JOINTS- Shear panel modelling
- Replies: 12
- Views: 393
Re: RC JOINTS- Shear panel modelling
There is a problem with the connection of the link and frame elements, they are not connected in series.
However, explaining how to model structures in FE is out of the scope of this forum. This is probably an issue that can be better discussed with your supoervisor.
Seismosoft Support
However, explaining how to model structures in FE is out of the scope of this forum. This is probably an issue that can be better discussed with your supoervisor.
Seismosoft Support
- 13 Jan 2021, 12:11
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: element class specification (integration section and section fibers)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 216
Re: element class specification (integration section and section fibers)
2-3mm axial deformation in a 3m column is a 0.1% deformation which (for an axial deformation) is very significant. Furthermore, it is not reasonable that at the top floor in column columns the vertical displacement is almost 3cm and in others just 1cm. Without delving into details (we cannot provide...
- 09 Jan 2021, 11:52
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: how to model a section of a RC shear wall with CFST boundaries?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 73
Re: how to model a section of a RC shear wall with CFST boundaries?
You could model each part of the section with different section types and connect the elements at their ends with rigid links
Seismosoft Support
Seismosoft Support
- 09 Jan 2021, 11:39
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: RC JOINTS- Shear panel modelling
- Replies: 12
- Views: 393
Re: RC JOINTS- Shear panel modelling
You need to check the restraints in the nodes of the link elements. Furthermore, you need to connect the beam elements to the internal x1 & x2 nodes of the links rather than the restrained external nodes.
Seismosoft Support
Seismosoft Support
- 08 Jan 2021, 16:09
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: element class specification (integration section and section fibers)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 216
Re: element class specification (integration section and section fibers)
If you check in the deformed shape viewer to see the displacements (from the menun on the left) you will notice that in some of the columns the vertical displacements at the top are excessive.
Seismosoft Support
Seismosoft Support