Search found 19 matches
- 12 Jul 2020, 16:47
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Yielding acceleration of structure
- Replies: 1
- Views: 743
Yielding acceleration of structure
Hello, is there a way to derive the yielding acceleration of my structure, when performing static push-over analysis, from the results of my post processor?
- 06 Jul 2020, 16:38
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Period of equivalent single degree of freedom system
- Replies: 2
- Views: 941
Re: Period of equivalent single degree of freedom system
That was what I meant. Thank you very much for your response sir.
- 06 Jul 2020, 12:33
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Modeling with infrmDBPH element type
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4632
Re: Modeling with infrmDBPH element type
I have the 2018 v3 of the program with an academic license. How can I upgrade it to the 2020 version?
- 05 Jul 2020, 12:44
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: Period of equivalent single degree of freedom system
- Replies: 2
- Views: 941
Period of equivalent single degree of freedom system
Hello, when modeling a structure, is the period and mass of the equivalent single degree of freedom system available somewhere in the post processor results?
- 04 Jul 2020, 16:40
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Modeling with infrmDBPH element type
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4632
Re: Modeling with infrmDBPH element type
Thank you for your suggestion, I watched and implemented all the suggestion of the convergence criteria video posted but to no avail. Is there any chance I could sent you my model, to check what the problem maybe is? I modeled the same frame with infrmFB and infrmFBPH and there was no problem. That'...
- 03 Jul 2020, 21:34
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Modeling with infrmDBPH element type
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4632
Re: Modeling with infrmDBPH element type
Thank you for your response. I didn't subdivide my members this time, but now the analysis doesn't even run, it stops at step 0. What could be the cause of that, having in mind all that's stated above?
- 02 Jul 2020, 19:46
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Modeling with infrmDBPH element type
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4632
Modeling with infrmDBPH element type
Hello, I am trying to model a frame with the infrmDBPH element type in order to conduct a static pushover analysis but my analysis keeps collapsing at really low displacement such as 8mm, displacements that are not logical at all. I have checked the geometry, defined the materials correctly, I subdi...
- 13 Jan 2020, 21:26
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Very different results when modeling with different element classes.
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2828
Re: Very different results when modeling with different element classes.
In order to clarify your response and be able to search accordingly. The localisation issue lies with the infrmFB element model? So the the accurate behavior is displayed by the infrmFBPH model?
- 13 Jan 2020, 10:46
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Very different results when modeling with different element classes.
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2828
Re: Very different results when modeling with different element classes.
Thank you for your response. Is there a solution to this issue that you can recommend?
- 11 Jan 2020, 17:56
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Very different results when modeling with different element classes.
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2828
Re: Very different results when modeling with different element classes.
I sent you my models for examination, thank you for your time!