hi,
how do we do time history analysis using accelerograms from any duration type?
are we cut the real accelerograms appropriate any duration type, then analysis it?
time history analysis using accelerograms from any duration
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 19 Aug 2015, 12:26
Re: time history analysis using accelerograms from any durat
Can you please explain what do you mean? I am not sure that I can understand the meaning of your question.
Zoi Gronti
Seismosoft Srl.
Seismosoft Srl.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 19 Aug 2015, 12:26
Re: time history analysis using accelerograms from any durat
There is four strong motion duration type according to SeismoSignal in Ground Motion Parameters Tab
Uniform duration, Bracketed duration, Significant duration, and Effective duration.
How do we use these in dynamic structure responses analysis?
what do strong motion duration describes?
Uniform duration, Bracketed duration, Significant duration, and Effective duration.
How do we use these in dynamic structure responses analysis?
what do strong motion duration describes?
Re: time history analysis using accelerograms from any durat
Hi hendrasusilo17,
The different duration parameters that you mention were not necessarily developed for the purpose of truncating accelerograms to use in nonlinear dynamic analysis.
Indeed, as you will readily gather from a quick read of some of the papers in which such duration parameters are proposed, the main motivation behind their introduction is that of facilitating the understanding of the characteristics of different records, of the earthquakes that generated them, and of their potential impact on structures (e.g. short duration records tend to be generated by relatively shallow non-subdunction earthquakes and are likely to damage degrading structures less than their long duration counterparts).
For accelerogram truncation purposes, you may e.g. decide to use only the part of the record corresponding to a variation of the Arias Intensity from 5% to 95%. Whilst this would mean that the duration of your truncated record would be the (5-95%) Signifcant Duration of the original record, you would not really be using such duration parameter to truncate the record, but you would rather be using Arias Intensity thresholds to truncate the record, colaterally ending up with a duration that corresponds to a duration parameter that is commonly employed to characterise records.
Hope the above helps,
Rui
The different duration parameters that you mention were not necessarily developed for the purpose of truncating accelerograms to use in nonlinear dynamic analysis.
Indeed, as you will readily gather from a quick read of some of the papers in which such duration parameters are proposed, the main motivation behind their introduction is that of facilitating the understanding of the characteristics of different records, of the earthquakes that generated them, and of their potential impact on structures (e.g. short duration records tend to be generated by relatively shallow non-subdunction earthquakes and are likely to damage degrading structures less than their long duration counterparts).
For accelerogram truncation purposes, you may e.g. decide to use only the part of the record corresponding to a variation of the Arias Intensity from 5% to 95%. Whilst this would mean that the duration of your truncated record would be the (5-95%) Signifcant Duration of the original record, you would not really be using such duration parameter to truncate the record, but you would rather be using Arias Intensity thresholds to truncate the record, colaterally ending up with a duration that corresponds to a duration parameter that is commonly employed to characterise records.
Hope the above helps,
Rui
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 19 Aug 2015, 12:26
Re: time history analysis using accelerograms from any durat
Hi rui
Thanks for your explanation.
Sincerely,
Hendra Susilo
Thanks for your explanation.
Sincerely,
Hendra Susilo