Search found 14 matches
- 21 Sep 2017, 16:29
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: diferent results for RC frame
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7822
Re: diferent results for RC frame
In line 7, "Z" value is correct... not "zero values".
- 21 Sep 2017, 16:17
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: diferent results for RC frame
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7822
Re: diferent results for RC frame
Dear seismosoft, Sorry for my comment. I should be carefull about my post. My model is 3D form of your verification report, chapter 4, RC-01 A. I create this simple model by building modeler without any problem and extracte the seismostruct file. I ran this model exactly based on acceleration of you...
- 21 Sep 2017, 09:30
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: diferent results for RC frame
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7822
Re: diferent results for RC frame
Dear Seismosoft, My problem was solved. Have you ever check the cantilever slabs which are specified by building modeler? I sent my model to your team. Please have a look at the slabs and specially rigid offset of the element. all of these values calculated by building modeler and seismostruct autom...
- 21 Sep 2017, 09:03
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: cantilever slab in building modeler
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4406
cantilever slab in building modeler
Hi seismosoft,
When I create a cantilever slab in building modeler, the preview of these slabs in seismostruct file I think is not true. Could you please create one by yourself and check it? It is an effect on my results.
When I create a cantilever slab in building modeler, the preview of these slabs in seismostruct file I think is not true. Could you please create one by yourself and check it? It is an effect on my results.
- 20 Sep 2017, 16:23
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: diferent results for RC frame
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7822
Re: diferent results for RC frame
Thank you. I sent my model to support@seismosoft.com
- 20 Sep 2017, 10:38
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: error in mass and weights
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2958
error in mass and weights
For a 2D simple model, I ran three analysis. The only different between tge analysis was the diffrent in defining mass and loads to the software in "gravity and mass" tab in setting. The results of these three models should be the same, but they are realy different. The masses were difined...
- 20 Sep 2017, 10:01
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: diferent results for RC frame
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7822
diferent results for RC frame
Hi seismosoft. As I said before in a previous topic, I want to run a dynamic time history on a RC frame which is a 3D-structures with one frame and cantilver slabs. My results did not match with experimental results. I also ran an Eigen value analysis and saw that the first period is 4 seconds!! But...
- 19 Sep 2017, 17:47
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: simple question
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9888
Re: simple question
Dera Tim Huff,
My model is created based building modeler. I only define one curve, but vertical axis is load factor. Infact, I think it may be has effect on my results, because I'm trying to verify the model based a experimental model, but results are not match.
My model is created based building modeler. I only define one curve, but vertical axis is load factor. Infact, I think it may be has effect on my results, because I'm trying to verify the model based a experimental model, but results are not match.
- 19 Sep 2017, 12:45
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: simple question
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9888
Re: simple question
see this: Is it clear that the analysis is dynamic, but vertical axis is "load factor", not acceleration:
- 19 Sep 2017, 12:17
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: simple question
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9888
Re: simple question
They are dynamic time history both!