Search found 38 matches
- 20 Dec 2017, 14:55
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Rigid Elastic element
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5752
Re: Rigid Elastic element
hi my question still remains unsolved :?: .as i want to create rigid links,using weight=0 with E=2E+020.after selecting the element type as ,elastic frame element,and choosing my previously defined rigid link,the the EI and GJ grays out with large value for EA, showing -INF and the OK button is gray...
- 19 Dec 2017, 12:17
- Forum: 04-Unexpected behaviour/errors
- Topic: Rigid Elastic element
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5752
Rigid Elastic element
Hi 1- i want to model Rigid Links using weight=0 with E=2E+020(Modules of elasticity).i had done this before but i seems it is not possible in the latest version of Seismo. 2- Also, i know rigid links can be made using the Constraints-Rigid link module.but i'm not sure whether i'm doing it right or ...
- 17 Aug 2017, 11:01
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: BRBF Model
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11340
Re: BRBF Model
Hi In response to this question, i'd like to mention that BRBFs should be modeled using "Truss Element Class" and there are some specific modifications that should be taken into account in Defining the material properties.Researchers might find the following article useful: "Component...
- 04 Apr 2017, 06:52
- Forum: 05-Future developments & requests
- Topic: Units Selector
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3370
Units Selector
Dear SeismoTeam
there seem to be an error in the Rebar Typology.
when the user changes the rebar typology from European Sizes to US Sizes,the confirm message appears :For Example:Eurpean sizes: 20mm<.....>US Sizes: 8 in.
Which will be 20 "cm"=8 in
Thanks
BR
Behnam
there seem to be an error in the Rebar Typology.
when the user changes the rebar typology from European Sizes to US Sizes,the confirm message appears :For Example:Eurpean sizes: 20mm<.....>US Sizes: 8 in.
Which will be 20 "cm"=8 in
Thanks
BR
Behnam
- 19 Aug 2016, 18:44
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: How can I get the Sa(T1,5%) from base shear ?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 15571
Re: How can I get the Sa(T1,5%) from base shear ?
Dear Mintesnot
Please find attached the excel file
http://wikisend.com/download/787320/Sa(T1).xlsx
BR
Behnam
Please find attached the excel file
http://wikisend.com/download/787320/Sa(T1).xlsx
BR
Behnam
- 19 Aug 2016, 09:36
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Modeling Section
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5333
Modeling Section
Hi
i would like to model the following sections.please give me your idea?
2IPE220PL110
and the following picture
http://wikisend.com/download/494470/pho ... -47-25.jpg
BR
Behnam
i would like to model the following sections.please give me your idea?
2IPE220PL110
and the following picture
http://wikisend.com/download/494470/pho ... -47-25.jpg
BR
Behnam
- 26 Jun 2016, 04:42
- Forum: 02-Getting started with the modelling
- Topic: Dome-Shaped Steel Structure
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4170
Dome-Shaped Steel Structure
Hi
I would like to model Dome-shaped Steel Structure?
Any starting hint?
BR
Behnam
I would like to model Dome-shaped Steel Structure?
Any starting hint?
BR
Behnam
- 04 Mar 2016, 19:22
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: How can I get the Sa(T1,5%) from base shear ?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 15571
Re: How can I get the Sa(T1,5%) from base shear ?
Hi MADU
you can not obtain Sa(T1) directly from the software.but this can be gained by post processing in Excel.Please find attached one of my project files.
BEST OF LUCK
Behnam
http://www.fileconvoy.com/dfl.php?id=g2 ... 4a8da88fbb
you can not obtain Sa(T1) directly from the software.but this can be gained by post processing in Excel.Please find attached one of my project files.
BEST OF LUCK
Behnam
http://www.fileconvoy.com/dfl.php?id=g2 ... 4a8da88fbb
- 13 Feb 2016, 01:40
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: PushOver: problem with steel structure
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6792
Re: PushOver: problem with steel structure
Hi LuCanic yeah,i have done time-history analysis. 1.are you verifying any special experiment?if so,there could some other reasons apart from eccentricity(i'd rather call it "initial imperfection"!)regarding imperfection pls take a look at 7/28 pdf paging in the following paper) 2.what dam...
- 10 Feb 2016, 14:27
- Forum: 03-Analytical/modelling capabilities
- Topic: PushOver: problem with steel structure
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6792
Re: PushOver: problem with steel structure
Dear LuCanic based on experimental formula,L(brace)/300, the 11 mm value is absolutely reasonable. 1.did you do an eigenvalue analysis to check if the model is ok? 2.how did you define the imperfection(eccentricities),naturally you should define the node using "structural node"? 2.please f...